Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45696

in Willow Wood, OhioPopulation 839

39.97/ 100

Ranked #26,779 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #972 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #21 of 65 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

6.2%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.04%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

73.8%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

28.2%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

38%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.1%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

69.5%

in the bottom 12.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 13.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

3 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Willow Wood, Ohio (ZIP 45696) comes out in the bottom 16% nationally (26,779th) and the bottom 17% of Ohio (972nd).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: civic registers in the top 6.3% nationally, and modeled transportation noise stands in the bottom 6.8% nationally. Unemployment lands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover is in the top 7.4% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise resides at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. By contrast, modeled energy burden rests in the top 2.2% nationally, and poverty lies in the top 8.0% nationally. Modeled loneliness sits in the top 8.7% nationally, and short sleep settles in the top 8.9% nationally. Modeled tooth loss registers in the top 10.8% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 45619, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.8%30.7–36.8
High blood pressure among adults42.3%38.5–45.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.5–10.4
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.3%8.8–12.0
Depression among adults27.0%23.6–30.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%12.5–16.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%35.9–43.3
Obesity among adults41.1%35.5–46.3
Stroke among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.8%18.9–26.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.8%6.7–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%76.8–81.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%76.2–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults85.1%83.0–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.4%55.8–64.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.6%52.1–58.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.5%62.1–75.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.3%12.8–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.4%17.1–23.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.9%27.3–36.7
Short sleep duration among adults42.1%37.0–47.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.5%20.1–27.1
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.3–21.8
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.3–18.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.6%14.3–18.9
Any disability among adults36.6%32.0–41.1
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.3
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.1–10.9
Mobility disability among adults16.7%14.2–19.3
Self-care disability among adults4.5%3.8–5.2
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.6–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.7%18.8–26.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.4%12.1–18.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.1%10.2–16.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.6–14.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.7–9.4
Loneliness among adults38.0%32.3–43.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.0–9.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–641.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)16.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle11.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription95.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate72.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population2.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households49.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+14.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age38.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$166,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.1 yr ± 0.9878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.98 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured