Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

45617

in Bourneville, OhioPopulation 0

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

33.66/ 100

Ranked #29,853 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.0%)

Ranked #1,106 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 6.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

65.3%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

19.4%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

39.4%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

45.1%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

19.5%

in the top 11.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

69.2%

in the bottom 11.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

50.7 mi

in the top 12.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Bourneville, Ohio (ZIP 45617) lands in the bottom 7.0% nationally (29,853rd) and the bottom 6.0% of Ohio (1,106th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A number of measures mark where this area is under strain: floodplain exposure stands in the top 2.1% nationally, and modeled transportation noise lies in the top 2.6% nationally. Modeled loneliness lands in the top 5.3% nationally, and obesity sits in the top 4.3% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability is in the top 11.6% nationally, and mammography settles in the bottom 11.0% nationally. On the brighter side, fiber broadband resides at the national maximum, modeled expected annual loss registers in the bottom 1.5% nationally, and modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise stands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs.

A note on the terms: expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 45601, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOHPartial

healthier than 15%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOHPartial

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.7%29.4–35.9
High blood pressure among adults37.7%34.0–41.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Current asthma among adults13.8%12.0–15.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.4–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.1%8.9–13.4
Depression among adults34.6%30.4–38.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%12.6–16.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%33.1–40.6
Obesity among adults45.1%39.3–50.8
Stroke among adults4.0%3.4–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.2%16.1–22.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%6.0–13.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%76.2–81.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.5%75.1–81.6
Cholesterol screening among adults82.6%79.0–86.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.7%64.4–72.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.3%47.0–53.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.2%61.7–76.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.1%10.8–15.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.1%16.6–25.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.9%27.7–40.2
Short sleep duration among adults39.2%34.5–44.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.5%19.8–29.8
Frequent mental distress among adults23.5%20.1–27.0
Frequent physical distress among adults17.2%14.5–20.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.5%15.7–24.0
Any disability among adults34.0%28.4–40.1
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.1–8.1
Independent living disability among adults11.9%9.5–14.8
Mobility disability among adults16.4%13.2–19.7
Self-care disability among adults4.9%3.9–6.1
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.2–7.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.3%17.3–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.5%14.7–27.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.9%14.4–26.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.4%10.9–18.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.0–13.4
Loneliness among adults39.4%33.6–45.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.3–13.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate—10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–64—9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)—7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)—23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)—3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle—3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription—89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)—23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate—78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)—1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population—2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households—53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+—19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age—42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income—$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value—$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent—$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.2 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 74.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured