Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38059

in Newbern, TennesseePopulation 8,281

41.94/ 100

Ranked #25,257 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #267 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.26 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

25.4%

in the top 12.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

21.8 days/year

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US79th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

2.4%

in the bottom 29% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US29th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Newbern, Tennessee (ZIP 38059) sits in the bottom 21% nationally (25,257th) and the top 43% of Tennessee (267th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: elder services is in the top 5.4% nationally, and pharmacy rests in the top 17% nationally. Working the other way, modeled expected annual loss sits in the top 3.6% nationally, and floodplain exposure registers in the top 12.8% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Recreation resides at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians lies at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Modeled cognitive disability settles in the top 19% nationally, and short sleep stands in the top 19% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is in the top 21% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 38050, about 12 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.2 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $62,281 predicts 78.2 years — 2.0 years below.

    Ranked #2,624 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.4%30.1–37.0
High blood pressure among adults40.6%36.5–44.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.0–9.7
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%8.5–10.8
Depression among adults31.0%27.0–35.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%11.9–15.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%35.4–44.1
Obesity among adults37.6%30.2–45.6
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.4%13.5–19.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.2%9.6–13.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.2%73.3–79.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.5%73.8–80.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.6–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.6%58.6–68.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.4%55.7–63.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.6%63.5–78.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%11.8–17.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.3%16.7–22.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.9%23.8–32.6
Short sleep duration among adults39.7%33.0–46.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.4%20.7–26.5
Frequent mental distress among adults20.2%18.0–22.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%14.3–18.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.2%16.2–20.3
Any disability among adults38.3%33.8–43.0
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.3
Independent living disability among adults10.0%8.9–11.2
Mobility disability among adults17.4%15.3–19.8
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6410.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)9.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle3.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription89.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate69.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households41.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+13.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age35.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$62,281$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$150,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$851$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured