Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45503

in Springfield, OhioPopulation 32,638

42.04/ 100

Ranked #25,183 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #891 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #12 of 15 Springfield, OH ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.8 pCi/L

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Park land

21.9%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

62.8%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

345 units

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

18.8%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US81st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

13.9%

in the bottom 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US23rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

41%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US77th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 45503, one of several in Springfield, Ohio, on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 21% nationally (25,183rd) and the bottom 24% of Ohio (891st).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: lead in tap water settles at the national minimum, park land stands in the top 6.4% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing is in the top 7.0% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home sits at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Physicians registers in the top 15% nationally, and grocery lands in the top 16% nationally. On the other hand, modeled radon resides in the top 3.0% nationally, and pfas lies in the top 6.9% nationally. Modeled arsenic settles in the top 11.8% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 45502, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Springfield, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.3%31.0–37.5
High blood pressure among adults42.6%38.5–46.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.5–11.4
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%8.0–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.1%9.2–11.2
Depression among adults26.5%22.9–30.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.2%13.3–17.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.0%36.9–44.9
Obesity among adults41.5%34.8–48.0
Stroke among adults4.4%4.1–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.0%15.1–21.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.0%7.8–10.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.3%78.9–83.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.9%77.8–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.5–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.5%59.9–69.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.6%56.1–63.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.3%65.0–78.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.9%11.4–16.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.6%15.5–19.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.9%29.4–38.3
Short sleep duration among adults38.5%33.2–44.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.5%20.0–25.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.6–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.0%14.3–17.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.4%13.8–17.1
Any disability among adults35.1%31.1–39.2
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.6–9.4
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.8–10.9
Mobility disability among adults17.4%15.5–19.5
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%18.7–25.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.5%13.4–17.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.8–15.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.2–13.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.5–9.5
Loneliness among adults34.7%29.7–40.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.7–10.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6410.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)11.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)7.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle9.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription91.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate60.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population3.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households46.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+21.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age41.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$59,595$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$168,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$892$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured