Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45144

in Manchester, OhioPopulation 4,119

29.51/ 100

Ranked #30,860 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.8%)

Ranked #1,138 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 3.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

32.2%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.9%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.8%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.0%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.5%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

30.6%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.7%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.5%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.1%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

10.0%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Manchester, Ohio (ZIP 45144) sits in the bottom 3.8% nationally (30,860th) and the bottom 3.3% of Ohio (1,138th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled tooth loss is in the top 2.1% nationally. Working the other way, modeled coronary heart disease rests in the top 4.7% nationally, self-care disability sits in the top 6.8% nationally, and independent living disability registers in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled diabetes lands in the top 6.8% nationally, and poverty resides in the top 6.5% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health lies in the top 8.9% nationally, and stroke settles in the top 7.8% nationally. Modeled mobility disability stands in the top 9.3% nationally, and unemployment is in the top 9.6% nationally.

ZIP 45101, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall. Modeled independent living disability is in the top 6.8% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.8%33.4–40.5
High blood pressure among adults44.3%40.3–48.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.9–10.8
Current asthma among adults12.4%11.1–14.0
Coronary heart disease among adults10.9%9.8–12.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults14.8%13.3–16.7
Depression among adults27.8%24.2–31.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.5%16.3–21.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.1%37.1–45.5
Obesity among adults43.4%36.6–50.6
Stroke among adults5.5%5.0–6.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years32.2%27.8–36.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.8%9.0–13.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.8%79.4–84.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%76.7–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults83.1%81.1–85.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.0%52.9–62.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.9%45.3–52.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.6%61.8–76.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.4–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults26.0%22.8–29.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.9%35.1–45.2
Short sleep duration among adults40.7%34.6–47.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.7%26.4–33.4
Frequent mental distress among adults21.0%18.9–23.5
Frequent physical distress among adults20.0%17.9–22.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.3%17.2–21.7
Any disability among adults39.4%35.2–44.2
Hearing disability among adults10.0%9.0–11.3
Independent living disability among adults13.0%11.6–14.6
Mobility disability among adults22.1%19.6–25.0
Self-care disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.7
Vision disability among adults8.1%7.3–9.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%19.1–26.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.0%19.4–26.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.7%20.2–27.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.4%13.1–18.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.9–13.1
Loneliness among adults34.3%29.3–39.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.9–14.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate30.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6421.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)12.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)10.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle7.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription83.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate75.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households48.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+15.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age41.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$41,489$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$136,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$667$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.0 yr ± 1.0278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.02 years of 73.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured