Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45068

in Waynesville, OhioPopulation 11,597

57.75/ 100

Ranked #6,604 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #117 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 10.0%)

Ranked #32 of 156 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3 pCi/L

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.2%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.7%

in the bottom 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.6%

in the bottom 12.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.8%

in the bottom 12.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.4%

in the bottom 13.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

2.1%

in the bottom 14.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.6%

in the bottom 10.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

9.1%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

5.5%

in the bottom 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US21st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Waynesville, Ohio (ZIP 45068) ranks in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,604th) and the top 10.0% of Ohio (117th).

continue reading

Taken together, the profile's clearest strengths surface right away: modeled transportation sits in the bottom 9.9% nationally, and food insecurity rests in the bottom 11.0% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity is in the bottom 12.3% nationally, and loneliness stands in the bottom 12.4% nationally. Distance to a nursing home settles at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled independent living disability lies in the bottom 13.3% nationally, and cognitive disability resides in the bottom 14.4% nationally. Against that, modeled radon lands in the top 9.9% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 14.0% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 45054, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 89%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.1 ± 1.3 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.1 years — 2.0 years above them.

    Ranked #1,371 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.8%26.6–33.0
High blood pressure among adults34.6%30.9–38.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%9.0–10.8
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%5.9–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%6.0–7.8
Depression among adults23.8%20.6–27.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.2–13.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.0%33.1–40.8
Obesity among adults34.3%28.6–40.2
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.1%7.4–11.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.6%4.6–6.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.8%78.1–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%77.3–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults88.7%87.2–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.5%65.3–73.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.6%67.6–73.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.0%70.3–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.7–20.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.3%11.1–15.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.9%17.5–24.4
Short sleep duration among adults34.1%29.1–39.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.5%13.3–17.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%13.7–17.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%10.9–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.6%10.1–13.0
Any disability among adults24.9%21.6–28.4
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.6–7.3
Mobility disability among adults11.5%9.8–13.2
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.0%15.0–21.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.1–10.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.5–8.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.4–9.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.5–6.1
Loneliness among adults28.8%23.9–33.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.7–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–642.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)4.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)36.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)4.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle3.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription94.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate83.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population1.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households54.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+20.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age43.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$96,147$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$335,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,323$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.1 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured