Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

44430

in Leavittsburg, OhioPopulation 4,827

32.98/ 100

Ranked #30,050 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.3%)

Ranked #1,112 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 5.5%)

Ranked #40 of 50 Youngstown-Warren, OH ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

45.1%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

15.7%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

76.8%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

16.6%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

45.8%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

22.6%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.3%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

14.2%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

27.7%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

20.5%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Leavittsburg, Ohio (ZIP 44430) ranks in the bottom 6.3% nationally (30,050th) and the bottom 5.5% of Ohio (1,112th).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled short sleep stands in the top 3.0% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure lies in the top 2.5% nationally. Modeled pfas lands in the top 2.6% nationally, and utility shutoff sits in the top 5.0% nationally. Modeled obesity is in the top 3.3% nationally, arsenic settles in the top 5.3% nationally, and tooth loss resides in the top 8.3% nationally. Modeled transportation registers in the top 7.6% nationally, food insecurity rests in the top 8.1% nationally, and housing insecurity stands in the top 8.3% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Close by, ZIP 44444, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Youngstown-Warren, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.3%28.2–34.1
High blood pressure among adults41.7%37.6–45.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.3%6.5–8.0
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.8–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.4%10.3–12.7
Depression among adults25.0%21.7–28.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.3%14.3–18.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.7%32.9–40.2
Obesity among adults45.8%39.6–51.3
Stroke among adults4.5%4.2–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.3%20.7–28.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.0%11.5–16.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.4%72.2–78.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.8%73.0–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults79.2%76.6–81.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.1%55.7–64.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.7%45.4–52.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.0%65.0–78.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.4–19.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults26.7%23.5–30.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.0%32.3–41.4
Short sleep duration among adults45.1%40.2–50.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.0%24.9–31.3
Frequent mental distress among adults21.2%19.0–23.5
Frequent physical distress among adults17.4%15.5–19.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.2%17.0–21.5
Any disability among adults36.6%32.4–40.6
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.2–8.9
Independent living disability among adults11.6%10.4–13.0
Mobility disability among adults17.5%15.5–19.6
Self-care disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.7
Vision disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.3%23.3–31.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.7%23.9–31.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults27.7%24.1–31.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.5%17.6–23.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.2%12.3–16.2
Loneliness among adults35.7%30.7–40.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults16.6%14.5–18.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–647.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)14.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)5.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)7.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle8.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription91.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate76.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households52.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+17.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age40.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$51,380$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$109,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$813$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.8 yr ± 1.1878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.18 years of 72.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured