Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

44411

in Deerfield, OhioPopulation 2,294

43.31/ 100

Ranked #24,099 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #833 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #32 of 46 Akron, OH ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

63.2%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

39.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

69.8%

in the bottom 13.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

4.6%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

20.8%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US77th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Deerfield, Ohio (ZIP 44411) ranks in the bottom 25% nationally (24,099th) and the bottom 29% of Ohio (833rd).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: distance to a Superfund site lies at the national minimum, and modeled pfas lands in the top 6.7% nationally. Fatal road crashes sits in the top 7.2% nationally. Fiber broadband is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled tooth loss settles in the top 11.0% nationally, mammography resides in the bottom 13.2% nationally, and arsenic registers in the top 15% nationally. Crowded housing rests in the top 16% nationally, and modeled short sleep stands in the top 14.9% nationally. On the better side, modeled disaster risk lies in the bottom 10.2% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Close by, ZIP 44201, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Akron, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.2%28.9–35.7
High blood pressure among adults38.5%34.4–42.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.0–9.8
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.1–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.1–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.0%8.5–11.8
Depression among adults26.0%22.4–29.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.0%12.1–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%33.9–41.8
Obesity among adults36.7%30.5–43.0
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.7%18.9–26.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.5%6.6–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%76.8–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%75.5–81.9
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%82.7–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.6%57.9–67.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.2%57.4–64.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.8%62.0–76.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.3–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.6%16.4–23.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.3%24.5–34.7
Short sleep duration among adults40.5%35.2–45.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.1%18.9–26.1
Frequent mental distress among adults19.3%16.9–21.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%13.7–18.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.0–18.7
Any disability among adults32.5%28.0–37.5
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.7
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.1–10.8
Mobility disability among adults15.6%13.3–18.5
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.8–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.6–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.7%18.0–25.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.0%12.0–18.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.2%10.5–16.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%9.6–14.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.0–9.7
Loneliness among adults35.5%30.2–41.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.3–10.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–644.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)7.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle1.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription80.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate85.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households46.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+15.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age37.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$77,560$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$173,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,016$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.6 yr ± 1.1878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.18 years of 75.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured