Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

44202

in Aurora, OhioPopulation 23,084

63.82/ 100

Ranked #2,556 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 8.0%)

Ranked #34 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 2.9%)

Ranked #2 of 46 Akron, OH ZIPs (top 4.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lack of transportation

4.1%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.5%

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.0%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

71.2%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.4%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.3%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.2 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.3%

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

13.0%

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Park land

12.9%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Aurora, Ohio (ZIP 44202) places in the top 8.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,556th) and the top 2.9% of Ohio (34th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled transportation sits in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and food insecurity lies in the bottom 2.4% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity rests in the bottom 2.6% nationally, and cognitive disability resides in the bottom 3.0% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff is in the bottom 5.7% nationally, fatal road crashes lands in the bottom 7.5% nationally, and modeled independent living disability stands in the bottom 4.2% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health registers in the bottom 6.0% nationally, and park land settles in the top 9.9% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled pfas sits in the top 4.1% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 44023, just across the boundary. Further still, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Akron, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 99%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 12.9; chronic-disease standing 72.8 — 60 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,397 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.9%27.1–32.8
High blood pressure among adults34.9%31.6–38.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.9–11.7
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.9–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.5%4.8–6.3
Depression among adults21.4%18.9–24.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.5–12.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%34.5–41.4
Obesity among adults29.7%25.2–34.6
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.1%6.7–9.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.4%3.7–5.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.9%79.4–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.4%79.9–84.7
Cholesterol screening among adults90.8%89.7–91.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.9%68.4–75.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.2%71.6–76.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%72.9–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%13.3–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.5%8.0–11.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.2%16.5–22.1
Short sleep duration among adults34.9%30.7–39.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.0%11.4–14.6
Frequent mental distress among adults13.3%11.9–14.8
Frequent physical distress among adults10.8%9.6–12.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Any disability among adults23.1%20.3–26.0
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Independent living disability among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Mobility disability among adults10.4%9.0–11.7
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.1–2.7
Vision disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.5%15.2–19.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.4–7.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.7–5.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–7.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
Loneliness among adults30.9%27.0–34.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.7–4.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–645.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)2.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)59.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription96.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate85.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population6.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households50.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+23.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age45.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$118,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$375,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,787$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 0.7878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.78 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured