Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

44052

in Lorain, OhioPopulation 28,282

34.15/ 100

Ranked #29,682 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.5%)

Ranked #1,101 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 6.4%)

Ranked #100 of 113 Cleveland, OH ZIPs (bottom 11.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

26.4%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.0%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19.1%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.3%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

16.7%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

30.4%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.9%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

29.8%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 44052, one of several in Lorain, Ohio ranks in the bottom 7.5% nationally (29,682nd) and the bottom 6.4% of Ohio (1,101st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: modeled tooth loss resides in the top 5.8% nationally. Set against that, modeled short sleep registers in the top 4.5% nationally, and self-care disability rests in the top 5.9% nationally. Modeled diabetes stands in the top 5.4% nationally, vision disability lies in the top 6.6% nationally, and utility shutoff lands in the top 4.9% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health sits in the top 7.6% nationally, independent living disability is in the top 7.1% nationally, and food insecurity settles in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 6.4% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Close by, ZIP 44053, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cleveland, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 92%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.8 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $45,023 predicts 76.9 years — 3.1 years below.

    Ranked #4,284 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.8 ± 1.0 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.5 years — 4.7 years below them.

    Ranked #3,291 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.9%30.0–35.9
High blood pressure among adults42.7%39.2–46.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.3%6.7–8.1
Current asthma among adults12.3%11.0–13.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%8.2–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.5%10.5–12.6
Depression among adults26.8%23.5–30.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.1%17.1–21.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.6%35.0–42.4
Obesity among adults44.1%38.4–50.1
Stroke among adults5.0%4.7–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years26.4%22.6–30.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.0%14.2–18.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.6%77.3–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.0%75.9–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults82.2%80.3–84.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.0%55.0–64.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.5%47.1–53.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.4%64.9–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%11.7–16.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.1%19.7–24.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults40.7%36.4–45.0
Short sleep duration among adults44.0%38.4–49.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.4%27.6–33.4
Frequent mental distress among adults21.3%19.2–23.5
Frequent physical distress among adults19.1%17.2–21.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.6%17.8–21.5
Any disability among adults39.5%35.7–43.4
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Independent living disability among adults12.9%11.8–14.1
Mobility disability among adults21.1%19.0–23.2
Self-care disability among adults7.0%6.5–7.6
Vision disability among adults9.3%8.6–10.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.8%21.2–28.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.8%26.5–33.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults28.1%25.2–31.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.7%19.1–24.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.8%13.2–16.4
Loneliness among adults36.0%30.9–40.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults16.7%14.7–18.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate27.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6412.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)16.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)9.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle10.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription83.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate54.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population2.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households38.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+16.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age38.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$45,023$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$116,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$883$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.8 yr ± 0.5178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.51 years of 73.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured