Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

44001

in Amherst, OhioPopulation 21,448

55.74/ 100

Ranked #8,593 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranked #164 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 14.0%)

Ranked #38 of 113 Cleveland, OH ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lack of transportation

5.3%

in the bottom 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.14 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Amherst, Ohio (ZIP 44001) lands in the top 27% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,593rd) and the top 14.0% of Ohio (164th).

continue reading

The profile opens on a set of genuinely favorable readings: modeled transportation rests in the bottom 11.1% nationally, and grocery is in the top 12.4% nationally. Modeled food insecurity stands in the bottom 13.5% nationally. Distance to a nursing home settles at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled housing insecurity lies in the bottom 15% nationally. On the other side, modeled loud transportation noise resides in the top 10.1% nationally, industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 10.6% nationally, and pfas registers in the top 11.1% nationally. Modeled transportation noise sits in the top 14.8% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 44839, about 4.1 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cleveland, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.1%30.0–36.4
High blood pressure among adults38.0%34.3–41.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.7–11.7
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.6–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.6–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.7–8.3
Depression among adults25.0%21.9–28.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.9%11.3–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.8%36.0–43.8
Obesity among adults34.2%29.0–40.0
Stroke among adults3.4%3.2–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.1%9.1–13.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%5.3–7.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.7%79.1–84.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%78.1–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults89.1%87.8–90.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.2%65.8–74.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.9%66.9–72.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.4%69.5–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.7–19.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.1%11.4–15.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.2%21.7–29.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.9%30.8–41.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.4%14.3–18.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.4–18.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%12.0–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.8%10.5–13.3
Any disability among adults27.8%24.4–31.4
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.9
Independent living disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Mobility disability among adults13.1%11.5–14.9
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.1%16.1–22.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.7–10.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.6–7.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.8–9.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.7–6.1
Loneliness among adults30.8%26.1–35.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.8–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–647.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)3.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)5.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription91.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate87.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population3.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households58.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+21.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age45.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$90,139$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$234,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,062$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 0.7678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.76 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured