Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

43938

in Mingo Junction, OhioPopulation 5,660

36.15/ 100

Ranked #28,926 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.8%)

Ranked #1,068 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 9.2%)

Ranked #25 of 31 Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

43.6%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.1%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

44.4%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

37.6 per million

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

57.8%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

9.5%

in the top 14.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US86th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.63%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

14.4%

in the bottom 29% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US29th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Mingo Junction, Ohio (ZIP 43938) ranks in the bottom 9.8% nationally (28,926th) and the bottom 9.2% of Ohio (1,068th).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled short sleep is in the top 5.3% nationally, and loud transportation noise settles in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled obesity resides in the top 5.4% nationally, air-toxics cancer risk registers in the top 8.1% nationally, and pfas rests in the top 8.9% nationally. Fiber broadband stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 9.9% nationally, modeled radon lands in the top 12.9% nationally, and poverty sits in the top 12.9% nationally.

To spell things out, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Close by, ZIP 26037, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.8 ± 1.9 years. A median household income of $55,446 predicts 77.8 years — 4.9 years below.

    Ranked #5,510 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.8 ± 1.9 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.0 years — 4.2 years below them.

    Ranked #3,102 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 37.6 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 72.8 ± 1.9 years.

    Ranked #1,780 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.5%33.2–39.8
High blood pressure among adults43.6%39.6–47.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.1–11.0
Current asthma among adults12.1%10.7–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults9.5%8.5–10.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.7%10.3–13.1
Depression among adults28.7%25.0–32.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.3%14.4–18.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.2%35.2–43.0
Obesity among adults44.4%38.3–50.4
Stroke among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.3%16.3–22.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.0%7.5–10.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.2%78.7–83.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%77.1–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.4%83.7–87.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.1%58.6–67.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.2%55.0–61.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.3%65.6–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.4%12.0–17.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.5%17.7–23.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.3%29.6–38.8
Short sleep duration among adults43.6%38.7–48.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.9%21.8–27.9
Frequent mental distress among adults19.7%17.5–21.8
Frequent physical distress among adults17.8%15.8–19.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.8%14.7–18.8
Any disability among adults37.0%32.6–41.1
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.9–9.8
Independent living disability among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
Mobility disability among adults18.9%16.6–21.2
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.6
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.6–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.9%18.4–25.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.0%14.1–19.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.7%13.1–18.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.4–14.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.8–10.2
Loneliness among adults36.4%31.2–41.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.1–10.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6410.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)8.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)6.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle7.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription83.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate69.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households48.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+21.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age40.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$55,446$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$101,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$942$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.8 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 72.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured