Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

43837

in Port Washington, OhioPopulation 1,329

41.04/ 100

Ranked #25,994 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #932 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.4 pCi/L

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

12.2%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

45.2%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

2.9%

in the top 11.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

63.5%

in the top 12.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Port Washington, Ohio (ZIP 43837) lands in the bottom 19% nationally (25,994th) and the bottom 21% of Ohio (932nd).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled tree cover is in the top 12.8% nationally, and expected annual loss sits in the bottom 17% nationally. Set against that, modeled radon lands in the top 5.5% nationally, unemployment lies in the top 6.1% nationally, and modeled obesity stands in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled short sleep rests in the top 10.2% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure registers in the top 11.3% nationally. Poverty resides in the top 11.7% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Physicians is at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

Against the wider neighborhood, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. On the overall standing, ZIP 43749, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.6%29.6–35.5
High blood pressure among adults42.2%38.6–45.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.4
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.1–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.2%9.9–12.7
Depression among adults25.6%22.5–28.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.2%13.3–17.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.7%34.2–41.2
Obesity among adults45.2%39.7–50.5
Stroke among adults4.5%4.0–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.5%14.7–20.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.8%7.3–10.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%78.0–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%76.6–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.1%83.1–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.6%59.4–67.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.3%54.0–60.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.3%66.8–79.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.4–18.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.5%17.7–23.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.2%27.8–36.2
Short sleep duration among adults41.7%37.1–46.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.9%20.1–25.7
Frequent mental distress among adults19.2%17.2–21.2
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.8–18.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.9%14.1–17.8
Any disability among adults32.7%28.9–36.4
Hearing disability among adults8.7%7.7–9.6
Independent living disability among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Mobility disability among adults17.1%14.9–19.3
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.6
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.2%19.0–25.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.3%13.8–19.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.2–17.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.2–14.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.4–9.7
Loneliness among adults34.9%30.3–39.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.8–10.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6418.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)9.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)7.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)12.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription84.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate83.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households65.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+30.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age48.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$58,929$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$113,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$935$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.4 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 77.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured