Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

43548

in New Bavaria, OhioPopulation 832

50.89/ 100

Ranked #15,018 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #369 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US6th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

94.9%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.16%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

3.4%

in the bottom 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

42.2 mi

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.7%

in the top 13.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.8%

in the bottom 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US21st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

9 mi

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US77th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

16.8%

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, New Bavaria, Ohio (ZIP 43548) lands in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,018th) and the top 31% of Ohio (369th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A number of measures place this area on solid footing: modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 6.5% nationally. Unemployment registers at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Homeownership rests in the top 8.8% nationally, and modeled transportation noise stands in the bottom 9.6% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Poverty lands in the bottom 11.1% nationally, and housing-cost burden sits in the bottom 12.2% nationally. Crowded housing is at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site settles in the top 17% nationally. By contrast, modeled radon resides in the top 14.4% nationally.

A note on the terms: disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 45831, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.9%28.5–35.2
High blood pressure among adults39.7%35.5–43.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.4–11.4
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.1–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.3–10.0
Depression among adults24.2%20.9–27.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.6%11.7–15.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.5%35.4–43.6
Obesity among adults37.9%30.5–45.5
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.3%11.7–17.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%6.0–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.2%78.5–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.4–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.5%85.7–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.9%63.0–72.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.2%62.6–69.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.6%69.5–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.6–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%13.0–18.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.6%23.0–32.4
Short sleep duration among adults36.9%30.8–43.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.9%16.1–21.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.7–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%12.8–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.7–15.3
Any disability among adults30.0%25.9–34.2
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.7
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.7–8.8
Mobility disability among adults14.5%12.3–16.8
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.1–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.0%17.7–24.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%8.9–13.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.4%6.7–10.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.5–10.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.2–7.1
Loneliness among adults34.2%29.2–39.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.2–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–642.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)4.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription88.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate94.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households59.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+10.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age40.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$96,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$174,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 1.3578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.35 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured