Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

43547

in Neapolis, OhioPopulation 663

51.18/ 100

Ranked #14,566 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #348 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #27 of 61 Toledo, OH ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US5th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

68%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

5.7%

in the bottom 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

11.2%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

10.4%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

94.3%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

53.9 mi

in the top 10.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Neapolis, Ohio (ZIP 43547) ranks in the top 45% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,566th) and the top 30% of Ohio (348th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: modeled disaster risk stands in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and home broadband subscription settles at the national maximum. Modeled expected annual loss lies in the bottom 4.9% nationally. Households without a vehicle resides at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Homeownership lands in the top 9.6% nationally. Against that, modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 4.6% nationally, modeled pfas sits in the top 5.0% nationally, and unemployment rests in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled transportation noise is in the top 8.0% nationally. Fiber broadband stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 43522, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Toledo, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.4%26.6–32.2
High blood pressure among adults33.0%29.9–36.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.3–9.2
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.4–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.2–9.6
Depression among adults27.5%24.3–31.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%9.8–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.4%32.1–38.7
Obesity among adults33.6%29.2–38.3
Stroke among adults3.2%2.7–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.7%10.2–13.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.0%6.1–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.1%75.1–80.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.2%76.0–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%83.4–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.6%59.1–64.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.4%63.3–67.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.7%72.7–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.9–20.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.3%12.8–20.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.7%22.1–31.7
Short sleep duration among adults38.2%35.7–40.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.1%15.7–22.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.1%15.8–20.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%11.9–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%11.8–16.8
Any disability among adults28.7%24.4–33.2
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.3–7.1
Independent living disability among adults7.8%6.4–9.3
Mobility disability among adults12.9%10.5–15.7
Self-care disability among adults3.6%2.9–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.6–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.3%17.7–25.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%9.5–16.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.1%7.3–13.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.3–13.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.7–8.5
Loneliness among adults36.1%31.3–41.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.0–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)3.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)11.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)5.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate94.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households63.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+16.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age43.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$99,851$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$214,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.9 yr ± 2.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.12 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured