Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

43111

in Carbon Hill, OhioPopulation 249

35.81/ 100

Ranked #29,079 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.4%)

Ranked #1,079 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 8.3%)

Ranked #121 of 127 Columbus, OH ZIPs (bottom 4.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

45.2%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

31.3%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

65.9%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Park land

41.2%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

37.4%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

Carbon Hill, Ohio (ZIP 43111) ranks in the bottom 9.4% nationally (29,079th) and the bottom 8.3% of Ohio (1,079th).

continue reading

A number of readings press hard on the profile and set its tone: modeled short sleep sits in the top 2.8% nationally, and households without a vehicle resides in the top 2.2% nationally. Modeled mammography stands in the bottom 3.8% nationally, and homeownership sits in the bottom 4.7% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 1.7% nationally, expected annual loss stands in the bottom 2.3% nationally, and transportation noise sits at the national minimum. Poverty resides at the national minimum, home broadband subscription stands at the national maximum, and park land sits in the top 3.2% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 45764, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Columbus, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.8%34.0–41.6
High blood pressure among adults42.5%38.2–46.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.4–10.6
Current asthma among adults12.9%11.4–14.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.1–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.2%10.0–14.5
Depression among adults30.3%26.4–34.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.6%14.3–18.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%35.1–43.5
Obesity among adults38.8%32.2–45.7
Stroke among adults4.4%3.8–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.9%15.4–22.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.6%6.4–11.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%78.6–83.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.3–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%82.8–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.0%57.8–67.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.6%51.8–59.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.9%57.2–73.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%11.9–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.3%19.2–27.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.6%29.8–41.6
Short sleep duration among adults45.2%38.7–51.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.2%21.1–29.8
Frequent mental distress among adults21.4%18.8–24.1
Frequent physical distress among adults18.6%16.0–21.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.0%15.3–21.0
Any disability among adults37.1%31.9–42.6
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.5–8.4
Independent living disability among adults11.2%9.3–13.2
Mobility disability among adults19.2%16.0–23.0
Self-care disability among adults5.5%4.6–6.7
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.3–7.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.2%18.3–26.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.9%14.8–23.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.0%14.0–22.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.6%10.9–16.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.8–11.3
Loneliness among adults35.1%29.7–40.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.8–12.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)10.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle31.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate37.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+62.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age74.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$46,694$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$987$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.2 yr ± 3.8378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.83 years of 84.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured