Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

43155

in Sugar Grove, OhioPopulation 2,361

49.81/ 100

Ranked #16,509 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #444 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #56 of 127 Columbus, OH ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

73.6%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.45%

in the bottom 14.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

16.7%

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Sugar Grove, Ohio (ZIP 43155) places in the bottom 49% nationally (16,509th) and the top 38% of Ohio (444th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled tree cover settles in the top 7.5% nationally, and transportation noise sits in the bottom 14.5% nationally. Modeled vision disability lies in the bottom 25% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled radon rests in the top 8.5% nationally, and unemployment resides in the top 16% nationally. Recreation is at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians lands at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep stands in the top 18% nationally, and fiber broadband registers in the bottom 21% nationally. Childcare settles at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 43148, about 6.9 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Columbus, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.2%30.6–35.8
High blood pressure among adults39.0%36.0–41.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.3–10.7
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.9–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.3%7.3–9.3
Depression among adults25.8%23.2–28.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.2%11.8–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.1%36.1–42.1
Obesity among adults35.3%30.8–40.0
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.1%11.2–15.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.5–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%77.6–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.3%77.8–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.8%86.4–89.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.2%62.6–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.5%62.9–68.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.3%66.7–77.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%14.1–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.3%14.0–18.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.9%22.5–29.3
Short sleep duration among adults39.9%35.6–44.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.2%16.0–20.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%15.3–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%12.7–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.3%11.8–14.7
Any disability among adults29.2%26.0–32.4
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.6–8.1
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.3
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.9–15.1
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.2–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%17.9–23.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.1–12.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.3–10.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.7–10.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–7.0
Loneliness among adults31.9%28.1–35.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.7–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–645.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)2.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)7.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription89.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate76.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households71.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+30.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age55.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$90,337$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$242,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$680$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 1.3378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.33 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured