Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46532

in Hamlet, IndianaPopulation 1,921

43.89/ 100

Ranked #23,515 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #584 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

43.1%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.2 mi

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

4.5%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Hamlet, Indiana (ZIP 46532) lands in the bottom 27% nationally (23,515th) and the bottom 23% of Indiana (584th).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: outer-floodplain exposure rests at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk registers in the bottom 20% nationally. On the other side, floodplain exposure resides in the top 5.5% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site settles in the bottom 7.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise is in the top 11.2% nationally, and fatal road crashes sits in the top 12.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas lies in the top 16% nationally, and crowded housing stands in the top 16% nationally. Physicians rests at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

Put simply, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. On the overall standing, ZIP 46346, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.7%30.2–35.3
High blood pressure among adults40.5%37.4–43.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.6–10.1
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.3–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.3–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.8–11.0
Depression among adults26.2%23.4–29.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.4%13.0–16.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.2%37.0–43.6
Obesity among adults40.1%34.5–45.9
Stroke among adults4.0%3.7–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.4%15.9–21.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.7%7.3–10.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.8–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.2%76.4–81.7
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%84.2–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.4%62.5–69.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.5%54.5–60.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.4%68.4–79.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.8%13.6–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.8%16.5–21.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.6%24.2–31.3
Short sleep duration among adults39.2%34.1–44.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.7%20.3–25.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.9–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults15.7%14.2–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.3%14.7–18.1
Any disability among adults35.5%32.1–39.1
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.7–9.3
Independent living disability among adults9.1%8.2–10.1
Mobility disability among adults16.9%15.2–18.9
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.9–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.5%20.9–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.8–16.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.5–10.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.8–12.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Loneliness among adults33.3%29.7–37.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.4–9.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–644.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)6.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)5.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription81.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate87.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households46.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+12.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age31.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$84,866$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$145,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$895$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.5 yr ± 0.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.90 years of 74.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured