Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38879

in Verona, MississippiPopulation 56

34.06/ 100

Ranked #29,709 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.4%)

Ranked #315 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

27.7%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

44.4%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.0%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

32%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.7%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

46.3%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.7%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

52.8%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

42.4%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

22.9%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Verona, Mississippi (ZIP 38879) comes out in the bottom 7.4% nationally (29,709th) and the bottom 22% of Mississippi (315th).

continue reading

The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: modeled loneliness lands in the top 0.8% nationally, self-care disability is in the top 2.8% nationally, and housing insecurity resides in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled vision disability rests in the top 3.5% nationally, short sleep lies in the top 1.8% nationally, and independent living disability sits in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure settles in the top 1.5% nationally, and food insecurity registers in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff stands in the top 1.4% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 1.3% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 38801, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.0%26.6–33.4
High blood pressure among adults52.8%48.3–57.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.8%4.2–5.4
Current asthma among adults12.7%10.9–14.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.4–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%7.6–11.5
Depression among adults19.6%16.4–23.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults20.2%17.3–23.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.6%32.5–40.8
Obesity among adults48.5%41.9–55.4
Stroke among adults5.5%4.6–6.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.0%18.7–27.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.7%11.5–20.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%76.5–81.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.7%80.8–86.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%82.8–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.5%53.3–63.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults5.1%4.3–6.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.8%67.3–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.0%8.2–12.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.7%17.6–27.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults46.2%38.9–52.9
Short sleep duration among adults46.3%40.0–52.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults33.6%27.8–39.3
Frequent mental distress among adults21.0%17.9–23.9
Frequent physical distress among adults17.3%14.5–20.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.6%18.7–26.6
Any disability among adults44.5%38.1–50.7
Hearing disability among adults5.8%4.9–6.7
Independent living disability among adults14.7%12.0–17.5
Mobility disability among adults23.9%19.7–27.8
Self-care disability among adults8.0%6.5–9.7
Vision disability among adults10.7%8.8–12.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults37.0%32.0–42.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults42.4%35.1–50.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults30.8%24.0–37.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults32.0%26.6–37.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults20.8%17.2–24.8
Loneliness among adults44.4%38.8–49.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults22.9%19.0–26.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate35.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–64100.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription27.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+64.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age70.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.0 yr ± 1.1578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.15 years of 72.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured