Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38450

in Collinwood, TennesseePopulation 2,611

34.79/ 100

Ranked #29,464 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.2%)

Ranked #507 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

21.4%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.8%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

72.4%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.2%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

14.5 mi

in the top 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.3%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.81 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Collinwood, Tennessee (ZIP 38450) ranks in the bottom 8.2% nationally (29,464th) and the bottom 18% of Tennessee (507th).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: grocery settles in the top 2.3% nationally, and modeled tree cover resides in the top 8.0% nationally. Pharmacy registers in the top 8.1% nationally, and modeled arsenic rests in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 8.4% nationally, and dental providers lies in the top 10.7% nationally. Set against that, modeled cognitive disability lands in the top 5.1% nationally, independent living disability sits in the top 7.5% nationally, and mobility disability is in the top 9.0% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health settles in the top 9.8% nationally.

To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Close by, ZIP 38452, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 81.6; chronic-disease standing 9.2 (bottom 10%) — 72 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #926 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.2%33.4–41.2
High blood pressure among adults43.5%39.0–48.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.8–10.8
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults9.7%8.7–10.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.3%11.7–15.1
Depression among adults31.1%26.9–35.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.4%14.3–18.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.9%38.3–47.8
Obesity among adults40.5%32.0–49.6
Stroke among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.8%18.0–25.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.7%11.2–16.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.9%76.1–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.8%74.1–81.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%82.9–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.7%55.0–66.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.7%49.7–57.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.6%61.8–78.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.4%10.9–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults24.0%20.8–27.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.3%28.1–39.2
Short sleep duration among adults40.2%33.0–47.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.3%25.8–33.4
Frequent mental distress among adults21.6%19.3–24.3
Frequent physical distress among adults19.3%17.0–21.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.4%19.0–24.2
Any disability among adults43.4%38.2–48.9
Hearing disability among adults10.6%9.4–11.9
Independent living disability among adults12.8%11.3–14.5
Mobility disability among adults22.2%19.5–25.3
Self-care disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Vision disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate22.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6413.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)15.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)1.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle7.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription79.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate78.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population1.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households56.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+28.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age51.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$42,887$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$107,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$608$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.2 yr ± 1.0678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.06 years of 75.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured