Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37801

in Maryville, TennesseePopulation 28,090

47.72/ 100

Ranked #19,292 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #131 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #16 of 72 Knoxville, TN ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

404 units

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

44.3%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, ZIP 37801, one of several in Maryville, Tennessee lands in the bottom 40% nationally (19,292nd) and the top 21% of Tennessee (131st).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: subsidized affordable housing lies in the top 5.9% nationally, and mental-health providers resides in the top 15% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lands in the bottom 16% nationally, and modeled energy burden registers in the bottom 20% nationally. Childcare sits in the top 21% nationally, and outpatient rests in the top 23% nationally. Against that, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss stands in the top 16% nationally, pfas settles in the top 18% nationally, and humid heat lies in the top 20% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 37803, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Knoxville, TN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.8 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $73,508 predicts 78.9 years — 2.1 years below.

    Ranked #2,822 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.6%29.2–35.8
High blood pressure among adults39.6%35.5–43.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.6–10.4
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.3–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.7–9.6
Depression among adults29.7%25.6–33.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%11.1–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.8%35.5–43.8
Obesity among adults35.9%29.1–42.3
Stroke among adults3.5%3.3–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.2%10.8–15.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.9%8.5–11.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%74.4–79.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%75.4–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%86.2–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.9%60.1–69.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.3%56.8–63.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.5%66.9–81.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%12.0–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.5%14.4–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.1%21.2–29.0
Short sleep duration among adults38.1%32.3–44.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.7%18.2–23.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.8%16.7–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%13.2–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%15.0–18.6
Any disability among adults35.8%31.6–39.8
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.1–8.9
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.8–9.6
Mobility disability among adults15.6%13.7–17.5
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.3–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6411.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)10.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription89.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate71.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population2.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households61.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+20.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age44.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$73,508$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$320,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,111$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 0.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.62 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured