Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37848

in Powder Springs, TennesseePopulation 145

35.32/ 100

Ranked #29,270 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.8%)

Ranked #491 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #59 of 72 Knoxville, TN ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

14.3%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

21.4%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.4%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.6%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Powder Springs, Tennessee (ZIP 37848) sits in the bottom 8.8% nationally (29,270th) and the bottom 20% of Tennessee (491st).

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: crowded housing stands in the top 2.4% nationally, modeled cognitive disability is in the top 5.1% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water rests at the national maximum. Modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 7.3% nationally, and coronary heart disease registers in the top 7.1% nationally. Better still, housing-cost burden lands at the national minimum, and poverty resides at the national minimum. Homeownership lies at the national maximum, and modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Unemployment stands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs.

In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 37709, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Knoxville, TN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.0%33.8–40.0
High blood pressure among adults44.5%40.9–48.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.9–10.9
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults10.4%9.2–11.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.9%11.8–16.3
Depression among adults30.6%26.9–34.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.0%14.9–19.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.0%40.0–47.6
Obesity among adults41.5%34.9–48.4
Stroke among adults5.1%4.4–5.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.7%19.1–26.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.6%11.4–18.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.8–81.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.1%73.9–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults83.6%81.3–85.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.1%58.1–67.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults45.6%42.3–48.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.1%63.3–79.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.4–15.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults24.1%20.3–27.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.0%28.1–37.9
Short sleep duration among adults38.9%33.2–44.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.6%25.4–34.0
Frequent mental distress among adults21.2%19.0–23.4
Frequent physical distress among adults19.2%16.8–21.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.4%18.5–24.2
Any disability among adults43.7%38.7–48.7
Hearing disability among adults11.0%9.8–12.2
Independent living disability among adults12.4%10.6–14.3
Mobility disability among adults22.1%18.9–25.3
Self-care disability among adults5.7%4.8–6.7
Vision disability among adults7.3%6.2–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–644.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)23.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription81.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)14.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households70.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age47.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$167,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.3 yr ± 0.9078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.90 years of 72.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured