Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37779

in Luttrell, TennesseePopulation 3,649

38.43/ 100

Ranked #27,764 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.5%)

Ranked #396 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranked #51 of 72 Knoxville, TN ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.4%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.7 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

Luttrell, Tennessee (ZIP 37779), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 13.5% nationally (27,764th) and the bottom 36% of Tennessee (396th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: fatal road crashes resides in the bottom 9.6% nationally, and modeled tree cover is in the top 13.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands in the top 19% nationally. Pulling the other way, PFAS in drinking water stands at the national maximum, modeled cognitive disability registers in the top 7.8% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 8.4% nationally. Modeled independent living disability sits in the top 14.6% nationally, and fair or poor health lies in the top 17% nationally. Recreation rests at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians resides at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

For anyone unfamiliar, PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 37709, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Knoxville, TN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.9%31.3–38.5
High blood pressure among adults41.8%37.6–46.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.3–10.1
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%7.7–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.7%10.4–13.0
Depression among adults31.0%26.9–35.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.2%13.2–17.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.2%36.9–45.7
Obesity among adults41.0%32.9–49.4
Stroke among adults4.4%4.0–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.5%15.2–22.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.0%11.0–15.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%74.7–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.6%74.0–80.8
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.6–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.4%54.7–65.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.6%49.5–57.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.4%63.4–80.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%11.5–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.8%19.9–25.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.8%26.1–35.5
Short sleep duration among adults37.8%30.8–45.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.8%23.7–29.9
Frequent mental distress among adults21.3%19.0–23.6
Frequent physical distress among adults18.2%16.1–20.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.4%18.2–22.7
Any disability among adults40.5%35.8–45.0
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.3–10.3
Independent living disability among adults11.5%10.2–12.7
Mobility disability among adults19.8%17.4–22.1
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.6
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.8–7.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6411.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)13.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle2.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription81.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate86.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households48.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+17.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age42.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$51,357$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$162,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$889$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.1 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 73.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured