Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37214

in Nashville, TennesseePopulation 29,805

52.62/ 100

Ranked #12,594 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #71 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 11.6%)

Ranked #35 of 110 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transportation noise

17.8%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Park land

16%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

36.6 per million

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US90th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.7%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

3.0%

in the top 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.0%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.7%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.8%

in the bottom 14.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

35.9%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, ZIP 37214, one of several in Nashville, Tennessee stands in the top 39% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,594th) and the top 11.6% of Tennessee (71st).

continue reading

The bright spots in the data define much of the story here: park land lies in the top 8.4% nationally, and mental-health providers is in the top 11.0% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 9.7% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing lies in the top 13.3% nationally. Modeled stroke is in the bottom 10.2% nationally. On the other side, modeled transportation noise registers in the top 3.1% nationally, air-toxics cancer risk lies in the top 8.5% nationally, and expected annual loss is in the top 9.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise registers in the top 10.0% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure lies in the top 11.1% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. ZIP 37206, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.4 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $72,012 predicts 78.8 years — 1.4 years below.

    Ranked #1,686 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 7.9 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 82.5 — 75 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,792 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.3%23.7–29.0
High blood pressure among adults31.9%28.7–35.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.3%6.6–8.0
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.0%4.4–5.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Depression among adults28.7%25.3–32.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.0%8.6–11.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.9%31.5–38.5
Obesity among adults30.4%25.8–35.2
Stroke among adults2.7%2.5–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.0%8.9–13.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.1%8.6–11.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.1%70.0–75.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.1%71.7–78.3
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.3–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.4%62.0–70.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.9%60.9–67.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.8%69.1–81.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.9%15.2–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.3%11.4–15.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.2%19.0–25.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.5%30.2–39.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.2%16.0–20.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.5–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.8–13.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.1%13.4–16.8
Any disability among adults29.9%26.5–33.4
Hearing disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.6
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.3
Mobility disability among adults11.8%10.3–13.3
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6414.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)7.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription92.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate62.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population9.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households51.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+15.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age38.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$72,012$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$340,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,684$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.4 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 77.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured