Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37213

in Nashville, TennesseePopulation 25

31.86/ 100

Ranked #30,348 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 5.4%)

Ranked #566 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (bottom 8.2%)

Ranked #110 of 110 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN ZIPs (bottom 1.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

48.9%

in the top 0.08% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

28.5%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

16.3%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

36.2%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

22.7%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

46.7%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.3%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

65.2%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

29.4%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

54.4%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 37213, one of several in Nashville, Tennessee, in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 5.4% nationally (30,348th) and the bottom 8.2% of Tennessee (566th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: modeled tooth loss stands in the top 0.08% nationally, cognitive disability resides in the top 0.3% nationally, and independent living disability sits in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health stands in the top 2.0% nationally, uninsured resides in the top 3.1% nationally, and short sleep sits in the top 1.5% nationally. Modeled vision disability stands in the top 4.3% nationally, and mammography resides in the bottom 3.1% nationally. Modeled colon screening sits in the bottom 4.5% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled high cholesterol stands in the bottom 2.9% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 37201, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOHPartial

in the top 0.03%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.08%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.03%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOHPartial

in the top 0.03%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOHPartial

in the top 0.03%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.3%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.01%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.6%18.8–24.5
High blood pressure among adults36.7%32.5–40.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults2.8%2.5–3.2
Current asthma among adults11.5%9.9–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.4–6.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.5%8.1–13.1
Depression among adults32.6%28.5–36.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.4%10.5–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened29.4%25.9–32.9
Obesity among adults43.6%37.8–49.4
Stroke among adults3.4%2.8–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years48.9%43.1–54.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years22.7%15.9–30.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure59.5%55.2–63.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults67.3%63.0–71.8
Cholesterol screening among adults70.4%64.6–76.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years54.4%48.9–59.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults29.7%26.8–32.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.2%56.0–73.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.8%15.9–22.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults32.5%24.2–39.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.3%30.9–45.8
Short sleep duration among adults46.7%42.0–51.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults36.2%29.2–43.5
Frequent mental distress among adults27.8%23.3–31.9
Frequent physical distress among adults17.7%14.4–21.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults28.5%22.5–34.3
Any disability among adults45.4%37.9–52.6
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.2–7.5
Independent living disability among adults16.3%12.5–19.9
Mobility disability among adults16.7%13.4–20.1
Self-care disability among adults6.8%5.3–8.3
Vision disability among adults10.3%8.2–12.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–649.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age17.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth66.6 yr ± 1.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.69 years of 66.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured