Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37189

in Whites Creek, TennesseePopulation 3,442

51.48/ 100

Ranked #14,150 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranked #85 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 13.8%)

Ranked #40 of 110 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

63.9 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

72%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

34.7 per million

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.6%

in the top 10.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 32% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US68th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

Whites Creek, Tennessee (ZIP 37189), by its composite score, sits in the top 44% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,150th) and the top 13.8% of Tennessee (85th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled tree cover is in the top 8.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Crowded housing stands at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Outpatient registers in the top 20% nationally, and modeled hearing disability settles in the bottom 21% nationally. Pulling the other way, fatal road crashes sits in the top 1.9% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk lies in the top 9.2% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise rests in the top 10.5% nationally. Physicians resides at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat is in the top 20% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 37216, about 1.6 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.8%27.8–33.8
High blood pressure among adults39.6%36.2–43.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.7–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.6–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.2–8.0
Depression among adults26.1%22.9–29.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.9%12.1–15.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%34.1–41.3
Obesity among adults33.8%28.9–38.8
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.9%9.7–14.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.5%8.9–12.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%75.6–80.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%75.4–81.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.8%87.2–90.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.8%61.4–70.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.9%56.7–63.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.3%70.7–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.7–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.4%12.4–16.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.9%22.3–29.8
Short sleep duration among adults37.7%33.3–42.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.7%19.2–24.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.1–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%11.9–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.3%13.5–17.2
Any disability among adults33.4%29.7–37.2
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.1
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.5
Mobility disability among adults15.5%13.6–17.5
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–642.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)2.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)3.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription88.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate76.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population2.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households43.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+18.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age46.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$87,047$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$383,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,367$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.0 yr ± 0.7578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.75 years of 75.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured