Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37090

in Lebanon, TennesseePopulation 19,774

49.92/ 100

Ranked #16,361 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #102 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #45 of 110 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

36.9 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

47.3 mi

in the top 13.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

32.1%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

32%

in the bottom 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US24th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 37090, one of several in Lebanon, Tennessee places in the bottom 49% nationally (16,361st) and the top 17% of Tennessee (102nd).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: distance to a Superfund site resides in the top 13.7% nationally, and modeled energy burden is in the bottom 17% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lands in the bottom 24% nationally. On the other side, fatal road crashes stands in the top 8.4% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss registers in the top 10.7% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat sits in the top 18% nationally, PFOA in drinking water lies in the top 18% nationally, and modeled pfas rests in the top 21% nationally. Lead in tap water resides in the top 23% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 37085, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.7%27.5–34.0
High blood pressure among adults37.2%33.3–41.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.1–9.8
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%6.0–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%7.2–9.0
Depression among adults28.2%24.5–32.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.6–13.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.5%35.4–43.6
Obesity among adults32.0%25.6–38.9
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.6%11.3–16.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.0%8.5–11.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.6%73.6–79.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%75.2–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%86.1–89.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.6%59.6–69.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.8%58.3–65.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.7%66.1–80.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.5–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.1%14.1–18.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.3%19.7–27.2
Short sleep duration among adults37.7%31.8–44.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.0%17.6–22.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.6–20.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.9–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.3%14.6–18.1
Any disability among adults34.1%30.1–38.3
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.4
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.6–9.4
Mobility disability among adults15.1%13.3–17.0
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.3–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–649.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)5.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription93.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate73.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population5.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households54.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+15.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age38.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$84,299$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$396,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,493$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 0.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.74 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured