Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36852

in Cusseta, AlabamaPopulation 2,308

47.00/ 100

Ranked #20,163 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #187 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

52 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.9%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

66.3 mi

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Cusseta, Alabama (ZIP 36852) ranks in the bottom 37% nationally (20,163rd) and the top 30% of Alabama (187th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 3.4% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 7.3% nationally. Housing-cost burden registers in the bottom 14.6% nationally, and modeled disaster risk sits in the bottom 18% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure rests at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Against that, fatal road crashes is in the top 3.4% nationally, slow internet speeds stands in the top 6.2% nationally, and modeled humid heat settles in the top 11.9% nationally. Recreation lies at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians resides at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 36801, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.7%26.0–31.4
High blood pressure among adults40.8%37.4–44.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.9–8.2
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.5–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.1–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%7.2–9.1
Depression among adults24.8%21.8–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.8%12.3–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.9%35.5–42.4
Obesity among adults40.3%34.7–46.2
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.2%15.5–21.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.3%8.5–12.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.9%73.3–78.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%75.7–81.9
Cholesterol screening among adults84.2%82.1–86.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.0%62.9–70.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.1%50.7–57.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.2%69.1–80.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.5–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.7%14.4–19.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.6%24.7–32.7
Short sleep duration among adults39.0%34.0–44.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.8%20.1–25.6
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%17.0–20.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.9–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.5%15.5–19.6
Any disability among adults36.2%32.2–40.4
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Independent living disability among adults10.0%9.0–11.2
Mobility disability among adults16.1%14.3–18.0
Self-care disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.2–6.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.6%22.4–29.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.4%16.8–22.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.0%11.8–16.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.6–16.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.9–11.4
Loneliness among adults35.5%31.1–39.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.4–10.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6410.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)7.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle3.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription91.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate87.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households46.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+16.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age38.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$71,071$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$203,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$847$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.9 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 74.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured