Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

27521

in Coats, North CarolinaPopulation 6,549

46.15/ 100

Ranked #21,174 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #535 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

20 mi

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

7.5%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.16 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST35th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Coats, North Carolina (ZIP 27521) places in the bottom 34% nationally (21,174th) and the bottom 33% of North Carolina (535th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: lead in tap water resides at the national minimum, and elder services is in the top 9.5% nationally. Grocery lands in the top 10.8% nationally, and modeled radon stands in the bottom 9.1% nationally. Modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 16% nationally. Pulling the other way, distance to an emergency room settles in the top 5.5% nationally, crowded housing sits in the top 7.6% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water lies in the top 14.4% nationally. PFOS in drinking water rests in the top 15% nationally, and modeled humid heat resides in the top 17% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 27501, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.5%25.4–31.7
High blood pressure among adults38.6%34.5–42.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.3–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.5–9.7
Depression among adults27.3%23.5–31.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%10.7–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.4%32.4–40.7
Obesity among adults36.7%29.6–44.3
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.7%14.5–21.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.8%11.7–15.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.4%72.4–78.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%75.0–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%83.7–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.5%57.0–67.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.3%53.5–61.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.8%64.1–80.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%12.9–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.3%14.9–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.9%23.7–32.4
Short sleep duration among adults36.9%30.2–43.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.6%19.9–25.6
Frequent mental distress among adults18.7%16.6–20.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%13.0–16.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.8%15.8–20.0
Any disability among adults36.4%32.0–41.0
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Mobility disability among adults16.2%14.2–18.2
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.9%20.3–27.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.2%15.6–21.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.9%12.7–17.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.0%12.0–16.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.4–11.0
Loneliness among adults33.9%28.8–39.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.9–10.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6420.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)19.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription92.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate68.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population10.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households50.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+22.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age40.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$61,590$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$227,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$894$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.7 yr ± 0.9978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.99 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured