Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36786

in Uniontown, AlabamaPopulation 2,216

22.37/ 100

Ranked #31,718 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.1%)

Ranked #616 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 0.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

12.4%

in the top 0.08% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

15.6%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

28.2%

in the top 0.10% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

19.7%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

8.3%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

58.5%

in the top 0.01% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

43.4%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

39.3%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

32.2%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

60.4%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People without health insurance
  • People living in poverty
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Distance to the nearest emergency room
  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

By the composite measure, Uniontown, Alabama (ZIP 36786) sits in the bottom 1.1% nationally (31,718th) and the bottom 0.5% of Alabama (616th).

continue reading

What the data shows most clearly about this place comes first: modeled self-care disability stands in the top 0.08% nationally, vision disability is in the top 0.3% nationally, and diabetes rests in the top 0.10% nationally. Modeled independent living disability sits in the top 0.2% nationally, stroke registers in the top 0.3% nationally, and obesity lands in the top 0.01% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health resides in the top 0.2% nationally, and tooth loss lies in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled mobility disability settles in the top 0.2% nationally, and high blood pressure stands in the top 0.2% nationally.

ZIP 36738, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall. This ZIP also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 1%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.5%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 83.6; chronic-disease standing 0.7 (bottom 1%) — 83 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #365 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.6%34.1–41.2
High blood pressure among adults60.4%56.2–64.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.6%5.0–6.2
Current asthma among adults12.9%11.4–14.5
Coronary heart disease among adults10.9%9.7–12.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults14.5%12.6–16.5
Depression among adults22.0%18.6–25.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults28.2%25.2–31.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.6%38.3–46.9
Obesity among adults58.5%50.3–66.3
Stroke among adults8.3%7.5–9.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years39.3%33.8–44.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.0%12.7–19.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.5%79.3–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.4%81.5–87.0
Cholesterol screening among adults82.9%80.3–85.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.9%54.5–65.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults33.3%29.9–37.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.6%66.5–81.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults8.8%7.1–10.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults26.9%22.9–31.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults47.3%41.4–53.4
Short sleep duration among adults50.6%43.1–58.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults43.4%38.8–48.3
Frequent mental distress among adults21.8%19.2–24.4
Frequent physical distress among adults21.1%18.6–23.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults24.2%21.1–27.4
Any disability among adults52.3%47.0–57.6
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.8–9.9
Independent living disability among adults19.7%17.3–22.4
Mobility disability among adults32.2%28.6–35.9
Self-care disability among adults12.4%10.9–14.0
Vision disability among adults15.6%13.8–17.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults33.4%28.7–38.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults51.9%45.9–57.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults52.4%46.2–58.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults35.1%30.4–39.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults25.9%22.5–29.4
Loneliness among adults39.9%34.1–45.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults30.1%26.4–33.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate39.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6413.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)14.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)35.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle10.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription81.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate73.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population3.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households37.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+17.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age37.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$33,375$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$70,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$475$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.0 yr ± 1.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.62 years of 77.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured