Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36726

in Camden, AlabamaPopulation 4,549

33.04/ 100

Ranked #30,037 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.4%)

Ranked #552 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 10.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Diabetes

22.3%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.3%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

55.1%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

30.9%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.6%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

50.1%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.5%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

25.9%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.4%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

33.8%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

Camden, Alabama (ZIP 36726), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 6.4% nationally (30,037th) and the bottom 10.9% of Alabama (552nd).

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled diabetes lands in the top 1.5% nationally, self-care disability is in the top 2.3% nationally, and high blood pressure resides in the top 0.8% nationally. Modeled tooth loss rests in the top 2.7% nationally, stroke lies in the top 2.0% nationally, and obesity sits in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled independent living disability settles in the top 3.3% nationally, and mobility disability registers in the top 2.5% nationally. Modeled vision disability stands in the top 4.1% nationally, and fair or poor health lands in the top 3.6% nationally.

The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 36425, just across the boundary. Modeled tooth loss lands in the top 2.7% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 95.0 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 2.2 (bottom 10%) — 93 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #56 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.0%32.4–39.8
High blood pressure among adults55.1%50.7–59.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults10.1%9.1–11.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.9%10.5–13.3
Depression among adults21.5%18.3–25.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults22.3%19.8–25.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.5%39.0–48.1
Obesity among adults50.1%41.5–58.9
Stroke among adults6.6%6.0–7.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years30.9%26.3–35.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.1%11.0–15.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.7%79.3–83.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.5%80.5–86.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%83.5–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.5%56.8–67.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults42.5%38.4–46.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.0%65.5–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.3%8.4–12.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.8%18.0–23.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.4%33.2–44.0
Short sleep duration among adults44.6%37.0–52.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults33.8%30.1–37.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%16.8–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults18.2%16.1–20.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.7%17.6–22.1
Any disability among adults45.6%40.7–50.7
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.6–10.7
Independent living disability among adults14.5%13.0–16.2
Mobility disability among adults25.9%23.0–28.9
Self-care disability among adults8.3%7.5–9.2
Vision disability among adults10.4%9.4–11.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.4%26.0–34.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults34.7%30.5–38.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults30.3%26.4–34.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.7%20.6–26.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.7%14.7–18.7
Loneliness among adults38.5%33.0–44.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults17.9%15.6–20.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6412.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)15.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)11.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle11.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription78.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate76.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households49.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+25.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age45.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$46,030$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$130,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$956$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.7 yr ± 0.9878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.98 years of 74.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured