Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36262

in Fruithurst, AlabamaPopulation 1,886

38.22/ 100

Ranked #27,884 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.1%)

Ranked #457 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Crowded housing

10.5%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

80.9%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.5%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST47th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

74.7%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST18th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

15.5 mi

in the top 10.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.4%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

60.9%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

71.2%

in the bottom 20% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Fruithurst, Alabama (ZIP 36262) lands in the bottom 13.1% nationally (27,884th) and the bottom 26% of Alabama (457th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: modeled tree cover stands in the top 4.6% nationally, and arsenic rests in the bottom 8.5% nationally. On the other side, crowded housing registers in the top 4.3% nationally, and modeled tooth loss resides in the top 7.9% nationally. Fiber broadband settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Home broadband subscription is in the bottom 9.6% nationally, and distance to an emergency room sits in the top 10.4% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol lands in the top 9.0% nationally, and cognitive disability lies in the top 12.6% nationally. Modeled independent living disability stands in the top 12.5% nationally.

Put simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. On the overall standing, ZIP 30125, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.1%29.5–37.0
High blood pressure among adults43.5%39.1–48.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.1–10.1
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%7.9–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.1%9.5–12.8
Depression among adults26.6%22.7–31.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.4%13.3–17.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.4%38.9–48.2
Obesity among adults38.6%30.4–47.4
Stroke among adults4.6%4.0–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.5%20.6–28.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.1%8.8–13.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.2%75.2–80.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%74.1–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults83.0%80.4–85.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.9%55.7–65.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.9%45.7–53.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.2%62.5–78.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%11.8–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.6%17.2–24.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.8%27.2–38.5
Short sleep duration among adults37.5%30.5–44.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.8%23.0–30.8
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.1–22.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.1%14.9–19.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.3%16.6–22.1
Any disability among adults41.1%35.7–46.5
Hearing disability among adults10.5%9.3–11.9
Independent living disability among adults11.8%10.1–13.6
Mobility disability among adults19.6%16.9–22.6
Self-care disability among adults5.4%4.7–6.2
Vision disability among adults6.8%5.9–7.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.5%20.5–28.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.1%16.3–24.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.5%12.4–18.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.5–15.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.4–11.8
Loneliness among adults35.5%30.0–41.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.6–10.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6418.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)14.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)5.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription74.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate81.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)10.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households59.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+15.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age39.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$68,611$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$155,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$779$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.4 yr ± 1.3778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.37 years of 71.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured