Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36108

in Montgomery, AlabamaPopulation 14,766

24.28/ 100

Ranked #31,537 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.7%)

Ranked #611 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 1.3%)

Ranked #41 of 41 Montgomery, AL ZIPs (bottom 2.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

10.3%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

25.5%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

7.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

13.0%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

36.2%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

17%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

54.5%

in the top 0.06% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

29.9%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

57.6%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

38.1%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

ZIP 36108, one of several in Montgomery, Alabama, overall, ranks in the bottom 1.7% nationally (31,537th) and the bottom 1.3% of Alabama (611th).

continue reading

This area's pressures are easy to read across the measures: modeled self-care disability resides in the top 0.6% nationally, diabetes settles in the top 0.4% nationally, and stroke is in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled vision disability sits in the top 1.3% nationally, tooth loss lands in the top 1.0% nationally, and independent living disability lies in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled obesity stands in the top 0.06% nationally, and mobility disability rests in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure registers in the top 0.4% nationally, and fair or poor health resides in the top 1.2% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. ZIP 36043, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Montgomery, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 1%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.2 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $33,291 predicts 75.7 years — 3.5 years below.

    Ranked #4,705 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 72.2 ± 1.3 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.1%33.7–40.6
High blood pressure among adults57.6%53.7–61.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Current asthma among adults12.2%10.8–13.8
Coronary heart disease among adults10.4%9.5–11.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.6%11.3–13.9
Depression among adults21.0%18.0–24.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults25.5%23.0–28.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.0%38.0–46.2
Obesity among adults54.5%48.2–60.9
Stroke among adults7.8%7.2–8.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years36.2%31.7–40.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.7%13.4–18.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.9%79.8–84.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.5%81.8–87.2
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%83.2–86.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.9%59.4–68.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults41.1%37.6–44.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.0%71.7–83.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults9.5%7.7–11.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.1%19.3–24.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults43.8%38.8–48.7
Short sleep duration among adults48.6%43.3–53.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults38.1%34.5–41.6
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.4–21.8
Frequent physical distress among adults19.6%17.5–21.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.4%19.1–23.7
Any disability among adults49.7%45.1–54.3
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.8–9.8
Independent living disability among adults17.0%15.3–18.7
Mobility disability among adults29.9%27.1–32.8
Self-care disability among adults10.3%9.5–11.2
Vision disability among adults13.0%11.9–14.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults32.3%28.2–36.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults42.6%38.7–46.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults39.8%36.1–43.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.7%26.5–32.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults20.8%18.6–22.8
Loneliness among adults39.2%34.3–43.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults23.1%20.6–25.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate35.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6426.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)22.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)7.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle14.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription75.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate61.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population2.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households45.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+21.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age42.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$33,291$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$73,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$807$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.2 yr ± 0.6478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.64 years of 72.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured