Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36078

in Tallassee, AlabamaPopulation 13,767

48.52/ 100

Ranked #18,276 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #151 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #14 of 41 Montgomery, AL ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.2%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

2.7%

in the top 12.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

Tallassee, Alabama (ZIP 36078), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 43% nationally (18,276th) and the top 24% of Alabama (151st).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: distance to an emergency room lands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic stands in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Distance to a nursing home registers at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Pharmacy settles in the top 14.5% nationally, and modeled radon sits in the bottom 22% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled short sleep lies in the top 8.6% nationally, modeled humid heat rests in the top 12.0% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure resides in the top 12.1% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol is in the top 16% nationally, and high blood pressure lands in the top 18% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 36024, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Montgomery, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.6%28.8–34.4
High blood pressure among adults43.2%39.8–46.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.1–9.5
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.5–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.9%7.1–8.8
Depression among adults23.5%20.5–26.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.8%12.3–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.0%38.5–45.5
Obesity among adults38.6%33.0–44.3
Stroke among adults3.9%3.7–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.6%13.2–18.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%7.9–10.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%76.4–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%78.0–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%85.0–88.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.2%62.3–70.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.7%53.3–60.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.9%71.0–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%12.3–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.5%13.7–17.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.9%23.6–30.4
Short sleep duration among adults42.2%37.0–47.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.3%20.1–24.5
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.8–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%13.0–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.9%14.3–17.5
Any disability among adults36.2%32.7–39.7
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.1
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.5–10.2
Mobility disability among adults16.4%14.7–18.1
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.9–4.5
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.9–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.7%22.8–28.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.1%15.3–19.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.9%10.5–13.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%11.2–14.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.9–9.7
Loneliness among adults35.4%31.6–39.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.5–9.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6412.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)9.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)5.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle4.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription90.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate73.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households46.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+19.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age38.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$69,289$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$178,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$936$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured