Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35905

in Glencoe, AlabamaPopulation 6,452

46.26/ 100

Ranked #21,033 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #204 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #2 of 10 Gadsden, AL ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

37.2 per million

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

44.1%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

45.9%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Glencoe, Alabama (ZIP 35905) sits in the bottom 34% nationally (21,033rd) and the top 33% of Alabama (204th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: elder services resides in the top 10.1% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lies at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Pharmacy settles in the top 14.2% nationally, and modeled tree cover stands in the top 16% nationally. Working the other way, modeled air-toxics cancer risk is in the top 8.2% nationally, and high cholesterol rests in the top 6.5% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure sits in the top 10.0% nationally, and short sleep registers in the top 11.6% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 14.6% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

In plain language, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. ZIP 35907, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Gadsden, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.1 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $67,042 predicts 78.5 years — 5.4 years below.

    Ranked #5,632 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.3%32.0–38.7
High blood pressure among adults45.9%42.0–50.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.7–11.7
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.8–9.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Depression among adults24.9%21.6–28.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.3%13.4–17.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.1%40.1–48.2
Obesity among adults40.6%34.0–47.5
Stroke among adults4.3%4.0–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.0%12.5–17.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.8–9.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.6–82.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%77.8–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.6–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.7%64.5–72.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.8%57.2–64.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%69.5–81.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%11.8–16.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.6–18.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.0%25.6–34.3
Short sleep duration among adults41.3%35.5–47.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.4%20.6–26.1
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%15.0–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.7%13.9–17.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.9%14.1–17.7
Any disability among adults39.0%34.7–43.1
Hearing disability among adults10.1%9.0–11.3
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.7–10.8
Mobility disability among adults18.6%16.4–20.8
Self-care disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%18.7–25.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.1%12.1–16.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.3–11.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.5–11.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.6–8.6
Loneliness among adults33.4%28.9–38.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.9–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6411.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)6.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle4.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription87.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate81.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households55.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+22.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age39.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$67,042$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$195,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$829$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.1 yr ± 0.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.67 years of 73.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured