Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35565

in Haleyville, AlabamaPopulation 10,642

36.17/ 100

Ranked #28,920 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.9%)

Ranked #508 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.23 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.4%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45.5%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23.2%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.6%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

30.4%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.6%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.5%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

47%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Haleyville, Alabama (ZIP 35565) stands in the bottom 9.9% nationally (28,920th) and the bottom 18% of Alabama (508th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: mental-health providers settles in the top 3.2% nationally, and lead in tap water rests at the national minimum. On the other side, modeled independent living disability lands in the top 5.5% nationally, and high cholesterol settles in the top 3.5% nationally. Modeled mobility disability rests in the top 6.4% nationally, hearing disability lands in the top 6.0% nationally, and fair or poor health settles in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability rests in the top 7.2% nationally, self-care disability lands in the top 8.5% nationally, and high blood pressure settles in the top 7.7% nationally.

For clarity, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. ZIP 35553, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.6 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $45,598 predicts 77.0 years — 3.4 years below.

    Ranked #4,575 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 70.8; chronic-disease standing 8.1 (bottom 10%) — 63 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,548 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.4%33.4–39.5
High blood pressure among adults47.0%43.5–50.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.9–10.4
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.8–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults10.1%9.3–11.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.9%11.8–14.3
Depression among adults27.3%24.1–30.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.1%15.4–19.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.5%41.9–49.4
Obesity among adults41.5%35.0–48.5
Stroke among adults5.3%4.9–5.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.4%16.6–22.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.3%11.6–15.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.3%77.0–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.2%76.3–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults83.2%81.4–85.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.2%59.1–67.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.6%48.3–55.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.8%66.4–78.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.4–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.0%19.7–24.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.3%32.3–40.7
Short sleep duration among adults38.6%33.3–44.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.4%27.6–33.4
Frequent mental distress among adults19.6%17.8–21.6
Frequent physical distress among adults19.0%17.3–21.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.6%18.8–22.7
Any disability among adults45.0%41.3–49.1
Hearing disability among adults11.6%10.6–12.8
Independent living disability among adults13.4%12.3–14.7
Mobility disability among adults23.2%21.1–25.6
Self-care disability among adults6.5%6.0–7.0
Vision disability among adults8.1%7.5–8.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.7%21.6–27.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.5%20.8–26.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.7%16.4–21.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.7%13.0–16.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.4%10.2–12.6
Loneliness among adults36.1%31.6–40.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.3%9.1–11.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6420.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)25.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle7.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription76.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate72.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population3.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households49.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+22.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age45.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$45,598$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$85,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$745$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.6 yr ± 0.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 73.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured