Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35098

in Logan, AlabamaPopulation 1,390

49.75/ 100

Ranked #16,580 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #125 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.67 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

8.0%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.12%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Logan, Alabama (ZIP 35098) lands in the bottom 48% nationally (16,580th) and the top 20% of Alabama (125th).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: fatal road crashes rests at the national minimum, and childcare stands in the top 5.6% nationally. Housing-cost burden lies in the bottom 7.3% nationally, and modeled transportation noise lands in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Crowded housing is at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Outer-floodplain exposure settles at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Set against that, unemployment resides in the top 11.4% nationally. Recreation registers at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat rests in the top 18% nationally.

A note on the terms: transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 35057, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.0%28.7–35.2
High blood pressure among adults40.9%36.9–44.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.3–10.0
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.9–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.3–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.5–9.7
Depression among adults26.1%22.6–29.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.1–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.1%36.9–45.2
Obesity among adults36.1%29.3–43.0
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.5%11.2–16.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.0%7.3–11.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%74.7–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%76.0–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.6–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.0%62.8–71.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.9%57.4–64.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.9%70.5–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%13.0–18.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.2%13.8–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.2%22.1–30.4
Short sleep duration among adults35.7%30.3–41.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.6%18.7–24.5
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%15.9–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults14.8%13.1–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.5%14.5–18.6
Any disability among adults35.8%31.4–40.2
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.6–9.5
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Mobility disability among adults16.1%14.1–18.2
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%19.0–25.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.1–17.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.2–11.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.8–12.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.8–9.0
Loneliness among adults33.2%28.4–37.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.0–8.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6424.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)11.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)9.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle1.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription87.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate62.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households45.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+22.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age38.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$80,517$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$173,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$803$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 0.9178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.91 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured