Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35214

in Birmingham, AlabamaPopulation 17,027

45.11/ 100

Ranked #22,285 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #237 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #65 of 116 Birmingham, AL ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

86.1%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

21.2%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

52.4%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

40%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.1%

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.8%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

15.7%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

28.8%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 35214, one of several in Birmingham, Alabama ranks in the bottom 31% nationally (22,285th) and the top 38% of Alabama (237th).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: modeled diabetes lands in the top 2.3% nationally, and high blood pressure sits in the top 1.7% nationally. Modeled loneliness is in the top 4.2% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk settles in the top 4.5% nationally. Modeled stroke resides in the top 5.3% nationally, utility shutoff registers in the top 6.0% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden rests in the top 6.9% nationally. Modeled food insecurity stands in the top 7.1% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled mammography lies in the top 0.3% nationally, and binge drinking lands in the bottom 3.4% nationally.

To spell things out, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Close by, ZIP 35005, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Birmingham, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.8 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $56,383 predicts 77.8 years — 6.1 years below.

    Ranked #5,746 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 71.8 ± 1.7 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.6%29.7–35.5
High blood pressure among adults52.4%49.1–55.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.3–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.5
Depression among adults19.9%17.4–22.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults21.2%19.0–23.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.8%38.5–45.2
Obesity among adults43.6%39.0–48.5
Stroke among adults5.8%5.3–6.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.0%11.5–16.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.2%8.6–11.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.0%79.8–84.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.7%82.3–86.9
Cholesterol screening among adults88.4%86.9–89.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.1%70.5–77.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.7%51.0–58.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years86.1%81.8–89.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.1%9.4–13.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.6%13.6–17.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.2%30.4–38.2
Short sleep duration among adults42.2%38.0–46.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.6%23.8–29.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%15.2–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.8–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.4%14.6–18.3
Any disability among adults40.3%36.7–44.1
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.3–7.9
Independent living disability among adults11.5%10.3–12.7
Mobility disability among adults22.3%20.0–24.7
Self-care disability among adults6.5%5.9–7.1
Vision disability among adults8.2%7.4–8.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.5%25.2–32.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults28.8%25.7–32.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.5%20.5–26.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.9%18.4–23.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.8%12.2–15.5
Loneliness among adults40.0%36.2–44.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.7%13.8–17.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6415.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)8.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)4.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle7.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription89.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate64.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population1.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households44.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+26.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age44.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$56,383$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$164,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$1,068$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.8 yr ± 0.8778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.87 years of 71.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured