Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35053

in Crane Hill, AlabamaPopulation 3,216

47.26/ 100

Ranked #19,850 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranked #178 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

45.7%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

96.1%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

47%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.23%

in the bottom 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

4.7%

in the top 15.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Crane Hill, Alabama (ZIP 35053) ranks in the bottom 38% nationally (19,850th) and the top 29% of Alabama (178th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: homeownership resides in the top 7.3% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise registers in the bottom 11.0% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. On the other hand, modeled high cholesterol rests in the top 3.2% nationally, high blood pressure is in the top 7.7% nationally, and hearing disability stands in the top 12.7% nationally. Crowded housing settles in the top 15.0% nationally, modeled humid heat lies in the top 16% nationally, and distance to a nursing home resides in the top 18% nationally.

In plainer terms, loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 35057, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 84.7; chronic-disease standing 16.5 — 68 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,179 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.3%33.8–41.0
High blood pressure among adults47.0%43.0–51.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.2%10.1–12.3
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%8.2–10.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%8.5–11.9
Depression among adults24.8%21.5–28.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.4%13.4–17.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.7%41.3–49.9
Obesity among adults36.8%30.1–43.8
Stroke among adults4.6%4.0–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.2%11.8–17.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.6%6.7–10.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.6%78.9–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.0%78.9–84.7
Cholesterol screening among adults88.4%86.6–90.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.3%63.9–72.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.7%55.2–62.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.9%69.2–81.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.4%11.0–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.5%13.7–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.8%23.3–33.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.8%30.2–41.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.4%20.0–27.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.3–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.0%14.0–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%13.4–18.0
Any disability among adults37.9%33.1–43.0
Hearing disability among adults10.6%9.4–12.0
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.3–11.2
Mobility disability among adults18.8%16.0–21.8
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.0–5.5
Vision disability among adults5.7%4.9–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%18.0–24.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.3%11.5–17.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.1–12.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.1–11.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.3–8.7
Loneliness among adults31.1%26.2–35.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.7–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6417.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)15.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle7.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription89.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate96.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households69.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+29.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age49.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$56,167$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$264,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$848$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.8 yr ± 2.7178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.71 years of 72.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured