Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34997

in Stuart, FloridaPopulation 47,075

54.61/ 100

Ranked #9,938 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranked #404 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #11 of 21 Port St. Lucie, FL ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

85.9%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

179.8 days/year

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

44.6%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.8%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

31.3%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, ZIP 34997, one of several in Stuart, Florida sits in the top 31% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,938th) and the top 41% of Florida (404th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: modeled obesity settles in the bottom 11.2% nationally, and energy burden lands in the bottom 9.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home rests at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Against that, modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 0.8% nationally, and pfas lands in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled humid heat rests in the top 1.8% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site settles at the national minimum. Modeled disaster risk lands in the top 3.5% nationally, and high cholesterol rests in the top 5.3% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss settles in the top 10.1% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 33455, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Port St. Lucie, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.8 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $78,136 predicts 79.1 years — 3.7 years above.

    Ranked #245 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.8 ± 1.4 years. The 46 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.5 years — 3.3 years above them.

    Ranked #652 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.0%28.8–35.1
High blood pressure among adults36.4%32.7–40.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.8%11.7–13.9
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.3–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%8.2–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.7%7.8–9.6
Depression among adults17.6%15.0–20.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.6%11.9–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.6%40.4–48.4
Obesity among adults27.9%22.4–33.4
Stroke among adults4.3%4.0–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.5%7.6–11.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.0%12.3–15.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.3%79.6–84.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%76.4–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults89.0%87.6–90.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.3%66.8–75.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.1%58.7–65.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.6%66.1–80.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.1–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.2%10.6–13.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.2%20.7–27.7
Short sleep duration among adults31.3%26.3–36.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.8%17.6–22.2
Frequent mental distress among adults15.0%13.4–16.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.1%13.4–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.0%11.7–14.4
Any disability among adults33.2%29.6–36.9
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.4–10.3
Independent living disability among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Mobility disability among adults16.4%14.5–18.4
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.1–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6421.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)7.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription93.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate80.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population13.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households65.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+32.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age53.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$78,136$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$378,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,600$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.8 yr ± 0.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.69 years of 82.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured