Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34608

in Spring Hill, FloridaPopulation 36,658

49.61/ 100

Ranked #16,776 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #592 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #90 of 133 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

181.1 days/year

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST44th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

424 units

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

92.6%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

92.9%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 34608, one of several in Spring Hill, Florida lands in the bottom 48% nationally (16,776th) and the bottom 39% of Florida (592nd).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 5.5% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled radon settles in the bottom 3.7% nationally, and distance to an emergency room resides in the bottom 11.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home registers at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Walkability rests in the top 14.4% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 14.8% nationally. Set against that, modeled humid heat lies in the top 1.7% nationally, PFOA in drinking water lands in the top 7.6% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water sits in the top 7.6% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 34609, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.2 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $64,345 predicts 78.3 years — 3.1 years below.

    Ranked #4,250 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.2 ± 1.1 years. The 46 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.6 years — 2.4 years below them.

    Ranked #1,819 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 90.1 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 30.4 — 60 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,751 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.1%27.9–34.3
High blood pressure among adults38.2%34.5–42.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.7–11.7
Current asthma among adults9.9%8.8–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.9–9.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%8.3–10.3
Depression among adults20.0%17.1–23.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.1%13.2–17.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.6%37.6–45.7
Obesity among adults36.5%30.5–42.9
Stroke among adults4.4%4.1–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.5%14.5–20.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.0%13.1–16.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.6%77.9–83.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%75.4–81.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%85.2–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.0%61.3–70.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.4%50.7–57.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.5%66.5–79.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.0%10.6–15.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.8%12.9–16.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.2%24.4–32.4
Short sleep duration among adults36.8%31.4–42.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.8%19.4–24.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.3–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults16.5%14.7–18.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%13.3–16.6
Any disability among adults36.1%32.2–40.1
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.2–10.2
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.3–10.3
Mobility disability among adults18.3%16.2–20.5
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.9–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6415.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)10.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle3.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription93.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate80.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population9.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households51.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+22.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age43.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$64,345$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$276,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,286$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.2 yr ± 0.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.58 years of 75.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured