Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34234

in Sarasota, FloridaPopulation 22,986

47.60/ 100

Ranked #19,443 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #668 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #40 of 42 North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL ZIPs (bottom 4.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

93.2%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

184.3 days/year

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST52nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

7.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

402 units

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

9.9%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

16.5%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 34234, one of several in Sarasota, Florida, overall, ranks in the bottom 39% nationally (19,443rd) and the bottom 31% of Florida (668th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: modeled pfas sits in the top 0.2% nationally, humid heat lands in the top 1.4% nationally, and transportation noise lies in the top 8.7% nationally. Modeled uninsured stands in the top 8.3% nationally, and housing-cost burden rests in the top 10.2% nationally. On the better side, transit registers in the top 2.4% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 5.9% nationally. Modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic is in the bottom 10.9% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 34210, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.7 ± 1.6 years. A median household income of $57,288 predicts 77.9 years — 2.1 years below.

    Ranked #2,869 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.7 ± 1.6 years. The 42 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.2 years — 4.4 years below them.

    Ranked #3,195 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.0%26.3–31.7
High blood pressure among adults40.0%36.7–43.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.2–9.8
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.3–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.3–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.9–9.7
Depression among adults18.9%16.3–21.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.6%12.9–16.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%35.7–42.7
Obesity among adults35.4%30.2–40.7
Stroke among adults4.6%4.3–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.3%13.6–19.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.5%14.6–18.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.0%77.6–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%76.8–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.9–87.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.7%61.2–69.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.4%51.2–57.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.9%65.7–79.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%12.1–17.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.8%12.9–16.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.4%25.7–33.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.9%34.1–43.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.4%21.9–27.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.7–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%14.2–17.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.4%13.9–17.1
Any disability among adults34.4%30.8–37.9
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Independent living disability among adults9.9%9.0–11.0
Mobility disability among adults18.0%16.0–19.9
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.8–5.7
Vision disability among adults7.4%6.8–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6424.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)13.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)6.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle5.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription91.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate59.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population16.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households45.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+20.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age39.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$57,288$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$255,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,456$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.7 yr ± 0.8378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.83 years of 75.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured