Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39180

in Vicksburg, MississippiPopulation 28,479

45.92/ 100

Ranked #21,435 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #95 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

706 units

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

50.2%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

142 days/year

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.9%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

46.3%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.5%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Park land

0.30%

in the top 39% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US61st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

ZIP 39180, one of several in Vicksburg, Mississippi, by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 33% nationally (21,435th) and the top 23% of Mississippi (95th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 2.7% nationally, and modeled binge drinking stands in the bottom 9.9% nationally. Distance to a community health center lands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled disaster risk is in the top 3.8% nationally, and floodplain exposure resides in the top 3.9% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 4.2% nationally, and humid heat lies in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled obesity sits in the top 6.5% nationally, and high blood pressure settles in the top 9.2% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers in the top 13.4% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 39154, about 4.4 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 8%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.1 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $56,837 predicts 77.8 years — 3.7 years below.

    Ranked #4,862 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.1%27.7–34.7
High blood pressure among adults46.3%42.0–50.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Depression among adults18.4%15.5–21.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.2%14.1–18.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.8%34.4–43.3
Obesity among adults43.9%35.7–52.3
Stroke among adults4.7%4.4–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.0%13.9–20.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.6%9.1–12.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%78.9–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.1%80.0–86.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%86.3–89.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.5%59.0–69.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults9.9%8.4–11.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.5%67.4–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.5%10.1–15.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.4%14.1–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.1%28.3–38.2
Short sleep duration among adults37.1%30.6–44.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.0%21.2–26.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.5–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%12.9–16.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%14.8–18.6
Any disability among adults37.7%33.1–42.2
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.6
Independent living disability among adults10.2%9.1–11.2
Mobility disability among adults19.3%17.1–21.7
Self-care disability among adults5.4%5.0–5.9
Vision disability among adults7.0%6.5–7.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.9%25.1–32.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.6%20.0–25.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.8%11.9–15.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.2%15.2–19.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.9%10.6–13.3
Loneliness among adults34.6%29.5–39.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.6%10.2–13.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6417.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)10.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle6.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription84.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate69.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households51.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+19.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age40.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$56,837$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$160,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$897$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.1 yr ± 0.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 74.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured