Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34233

in Sarasota, FloridaPopulation 19,123

58.33/ 100

Ranked #6,129 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #237 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #18 of 42 North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

91.3%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

202.7 days/year

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

3.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.32 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.21 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.53 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.27 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

3.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, ZIP 34233, one of several in Sarasota, Florida stands in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,129th) and the top 24% of Florida (237th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: dental providers registers in the top 2.3% nationally, and physicians lies in the top 3.1% nationally. Grocery is in the top 3.4% nationally, and mental-health providers registers in the top 3.8% nationally. Pharmacy lies in the top 4.5% nationally, elder services is in the top 5.3% nationally, and transit registers in the top 7.8% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas lies in the top 0.3% nationally, modeled humid heat is in the top 0.4% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water registers at the national maximum.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 34238, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.6 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $75,394 predicts 79.0 years — 2.7 years above.

    Ranked #560 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.2%29.2–35.4
High blood pressure among adults38.9%35.3–42.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.1%12.0–14.2
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.2–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.9%7.0–8.9
Depression among adults18.8%16.2–21.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.0%10.5–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.6%38.8–46.4
Obesity among adults29.3%24.5–34.5
Stroke among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%8.2–12.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.9%8.4–11.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.5%80.0–84.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%78.8–84.2
Cholesterol screening among adults90.2%88.9–91.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.4%66.2–74.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.2%64.1–70.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.8%68.0–81.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.7–17.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.8%9.2–12.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.4%19.1–26.0
Short sleep duration among adults31.7%27.4–36.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.5%15.4–19.9
Frequent mental distress among adults14.1%12.6–15.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.4–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.2%9.9–12.7
Any disability among adults29.8%26.3–33.5
Hearing disability among adults9.0%8.1–10.1
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.3–8.0
Mobility disability among adults15.0%13.1–17.1
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6417.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)4.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)43.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)1.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle3.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription91.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate74.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population16.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households56.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+31.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age52.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$75,394$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$411,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,907$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.6 yr ± 0.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.70 years of 81.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured