Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33917

in North Fort Myers, FloridaPopulation 33,380

44.28/ 100

Ranked #23,136 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #766 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #31 of 35 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL ZIPs (bottom 11.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

206.7 days/year

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

12.7%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

0.97%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.5%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

47.1%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.0%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

47.8%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.4%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

47.9%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.3%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 33917, one of several in North Fort Myers, Florida ranks in the bottom 28% nationally (23,136th) and the bottom 21% of Florida (766th).

continue reading

Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled humid heat lands in the top 0.3% nationally, and coronary heart disease registers in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled hearing disability sits in the top 3.0% nationally, and high cholesterol rests in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled stroke is in the top 4.1% nationally, floodplain exposure stands in the top 4.3% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure settles in the top 6.1% nationally. Modeled diabetes lies in the top 7.2% nationally. On the encouraging side, modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and binge drinking lands in the bottom 4.3% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 33903, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.4 ± 1.4 years. The 42 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.8 years — 2.4 years below them.

    Ranked #1,876 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults40.0%36.8–43.3
High blood pressure among adults47.9%44.4–51.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults15.2%14.0–16.6
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.8–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults12.7%11.5–13.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.7%11.5–14.1
Depression among adults18.1%15.7–20.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.3%16.3–20.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened47.1%43.4–50.9
Obesity among adults31.3%26.8–36.3
Stroke among adults6.0%5.5–6.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.2%12.6–18.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.0%12.5–15.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.7%82.5–86.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.4%81.0–85.7
Cholesterol screening among adults90.0%88.9–91.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.5%66.2–74.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.8%55.5–62.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.0%68.4–81.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.4%9.6–13.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.3%13.5–17.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.7%27.1–34.7
Short sleep duration among adults32.4%27.9–37.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.1%21.6–26.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.0%13.6–16.7
Frequent physical distress among adults18.1%16.3–20.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.2%12.9–15.8
Any disability among adults39.0%35.4–42.8
Hearing disability among adults12.5%11.3–13.8
Independent living disability among adults10.4%9.4–11.6
Mobility disability among adults22.0%19.7–24.5
Self-care disability among adults5.6%5.1–6.2
Vision disability among adults7.3%6.7–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6424.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)12.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle6.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription86.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate83.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population10.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households69.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+38.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age59.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$55,000$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$198,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,360$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.4 yr ± 0.7378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.73 years of 76.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured