Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

75974

in Tenaha, TexasPopulation 2,592

36.57/ 100

Ranked #28,719 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.5%)

Ranked #1,671 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 10.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

19.9%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

56.6%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST23rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

28.7%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

138.2 days/year

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

13.6%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

51.1 days/year

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST30th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

40.8%

in the top 28% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

Tenaha, Texas (ZIP 75974) ranks in the bottom 10.5% nationally (28,719th) and the bottom 10.6% of Texas (1,671st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled radon lands in the bottom 4.9% nationally. On the other side, modeled uninsured settles in the top 4.6% nationally, air-toxics cancer risk rests in the top 4.5% nationally, and colon screening lands in the bottom 6.8% nationally. Poverty settles in the top 7.7% nationally, modeled humid heat rests in the top 7.8% nationally, and households without a vehicle lands in the top 8.8% nationally. Modeled extreme heat settles in the top 9.1% nationally, and fair or poor health rests in the top 11.3% nationally.

For context, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 75633, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 4%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.2%25.4–31.0
High blood pressure among adults40.6%36.8–44.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.4%6.8–8.0
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.0–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.1–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.5–10.5
Depression among adults24.1%21.0–27.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.8%14.1–17.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.8%34.9–42.6
Obesity among adults41.7%34.4–49.3
Stroke among adults4.5%4.1–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.8%15.0–20.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.9%17.4–22.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.3%74.8–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%71.8–78.3
Cholesterol screening among adults83.8%81.9–85.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.6%51.8–60.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults47.6%44.2–50.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.3%62.4–76.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%13.0–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.8%16.6–21.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.7%30.3–39.1
Short sleep duration among adults41.1%34.5–47.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.6%25.7–31.4
Frequent mental distress among adults19.7%17.8–21.8
Frequent physical distress among adults17.0%15.3–18.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.6%16.8–20.5
Any disability among adults38.3%34.4–42.4
Hearing disability among adults8.1%7.3–8.9
Independent living disability among adults11.4%10.3–12.6
Mobility disability among adults19.5%17.5–21.6
Self-care disability among adults5.9%5.4–6.4
Vision disability among adults7.8%7.1–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6436.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)24.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)0.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle13.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription78.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate69.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population10.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households49.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+16.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age39.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$47,292$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$91,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$642$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.4 yr ± 0.8778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.87 years of 77.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured