Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33703

in St. Petersburg, FloridaPopulation 25,264

59.12/ 100

Ranked #5,511 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #216 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #35 of 133 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

184.1 days/year

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST51st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

68.6%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

100 intersections/sq mi

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 10.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.0%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

14.4%

in the bottom 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

2.8%

in the bottom 12.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

3.7%

in the bottom 13.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Judged by its overall standing, ZIP 33703, one of several in St. Petersburg, Florida sits in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,511th) and the top 22% of Florida (216th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Walkability resides in the top 9.9% nationally, and modeled energy burden sits in the bottom 7.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise stands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, modeled humid heat resides in the top 1.5% nationally, and floodplain exposure sits in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 8.1% nationally, and expected annual loss resides in the top 10.7% nationally. Modeled tree cover sits in the bottom 11.5% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water stands in the top 11.6% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 33704, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 1.0%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.3%23.4–29.3
High blood pressure among adults31.5%28.0–35.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.3–11.3
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.1–10.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
Depression among adults19.9%16.9–23.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%8.7–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.1%35.1–43.2
Obesity among adults29.3%24.1–34.8
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.0%5.7–8.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.7%7.5–10.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.6%73.2–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.1%74.5–81.2
Cholesterol screening among adults89.1%87.6–90.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.5%66.3–74.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.3%64.3–70.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.2%69.5–81.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.9%14.8–21.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.1%8.5–11.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.3%15.4–21.6
Short sleep duration among adults33.2%28.6–38.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.4%12.5–16.5
Frequent mental distress among adults14.9%13.1–16.7
Frequent physical distress among adults11.9%10.4–13.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.3%9.9–12.7
Any disability among adults25.6%22.2–29.2
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.3
Independent living disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.9
Mobility disability among adults11.3%9.7–13.0
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.4–4.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6411.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)4.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)53.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)3.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle4.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription92.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate80.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population10.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households53.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+20.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age44.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$95,224$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$441,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,833$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.5 yr ± 0.7178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.71 years of 78.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured