Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33510

in Brandon, FloridaPopulation 30,578

54.87/ 100

Ranked #9,595 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #387 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #60 of 133 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

91.8%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

1,267 units

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

187.5 days/year

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.8 mi

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

91.6%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

16.8%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.4%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST51st
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

83.5%

in the top 21% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US79th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 33510, one of several in Brandon, Florida comes out in the top 30% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,595th) and the top 40% of Florida (387th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 0.9% nationally, modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 9.9% nationally, and distance to an emergency room registers in the bottom 13.3% nationally. By contrast, modeled pfas stands in the top 0.3% nationally, modeled humid heat lands in the top 1.2% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site is in the bottom 6.6% nationally. PFOS in drinking water resides in the top 8.3% nationally, and modeled uninsured rests in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss lies in the top 9.3% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 9.6% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 33511, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.1%20.7–25.6
High blood pressure among adults34.8%31.5–38.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.3%6.7–8.0
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.5–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Depression among adults17.3%14.8–19.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.6%11.1–14.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.8%36.4–43.3
Obesity among adults32.2%27.5–37.0
Stroke among adults3.3%3.1–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.9%8.8–13.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.8%14.8–18.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.9%72.0–77.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.3%73.0–79.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%83.5–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.9%60.3–69.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.6%54.3–60.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.8%72.5–84.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.3%13.7–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.4%11.7–15.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.2%21.8–28.5
Short sleep duration among adults39.1%34.5–43.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.3%18.1–22.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.6–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.4–15.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.6%13.1–16.1
Any disability among adults31.0%27.6–34.3
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.5–9.2
Mobility disability among adults13.9%12.2–15.6
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.5–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6416.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)12.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle5.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription91.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate62.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population16.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households43.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+14.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age37.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$74,245$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$328,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,483$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.3 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 78.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured