Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33625

in Tampa, FloridaPopulation 29,967

59.35/ 100

Ranked #5,322 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #208 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #32 of 133 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

91.4%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

182.1 days/year

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST46th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

890 units

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.49 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.87 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

16%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

89.1%

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

79.2%

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US84th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 33625, one of several in Tampa, Florida places in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,322nd) and the top 21% of Florida (208th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 1.8% nationally, and outpatient sits in the top 8.2% nationally. Dental providers lies in the top 9.2% nationally, and physicians rests in the top 11.6% nationally. Modeled radon resides in the bottom 5.4% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled pfas is in the top 0.3% nationally, modeled humid heat lands in the top 1.6% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site stands in the bottom 10.7% nationally. Modeled uninsured registers in the top 9.2% nationally, and expected annual loss settles in the top 12.1% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 33556, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.7%19.4–24.1
High blood pressure among adults32.8%29.6–36.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.1%6.5–7.8
Current asthma among adults9.0%8.0–10.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.0–6.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Depression among adults16.1%13.8–18.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.8–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.1%36.5–43.6
Obesity among adults30.5%25.9–35.2
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.0%8.2–12.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.0%13.9–18.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.0%71.9–77.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.5%73.3–79.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%85.2–88.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.0%58.5–67.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.6%56.3–62.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.2%73.0–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.5%14.0–19.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.9%9.5–12.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.1%20.0–26.4
Short sleep duration among adults37.8%33.2–42.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.1%16.0–20.2
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%13.9–17.2
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.3–14.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.6%11.2–14.0
Any disability among adults27.8%24.7–31.1
Hearing disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.6
Independent living disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.6
Mobility disability among adults12.3%10.8–13.9
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6416.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)7.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)40.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle3.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription94.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate66.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population29.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households55.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+15.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age40.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$93,133$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$380,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,894$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured