Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32805

in Orlando, FloridaPopulation 19,294

42.54/ 100

Ranked #24,783 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #818 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #89 of 92 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL ZIPs (bottom 3.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

48.6%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

14 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

182.3 days/year

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST47th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.1%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.4%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

656 units

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

48.2%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

18.8%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.77 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.2%

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 32805, one of several in Orlando, Florida lands in the bottom 23% nationally (24,783rd) and the bottom 16% of Florida (818th).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled short sleep lands in the top 0.7% nationally, and humid heat sits in the top 1.6% nationally. Modeled vision disability is in the top 4.7% nationally, and self-care disability settles in the top 4.4% nationally. Housing-cost burden resides in the top 3.8% nationally, and modeled uninsured registers in the top 5.6% nationally. On the better side, transit rests in the top 0.7% nationally, subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 3.1% nationally, and childcare lies in the top 4.2% nationally. Modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 3.7% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 32801, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.8 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $40,515 predicts 76.5 years — 2.8 years below.

    Ranked #3,808 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.8 ± 1.3 years. The 46 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.9 years — 6.1 years below them.

    Ranked #3,558 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.0%24.1–29.8
High blood pressure among adults45.2%41.6–48.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.0%5.4–6.6
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.5–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%8.5–10.4
Depression among adults15.7%13.4–18.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.8%16.7–20.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.1%34.5–41.7
Obesity among adults42.5%36.9–48.0
Stroke among adults5.7%5.3–6.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.6%19.1–26.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years18.8%16.6–21.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%77.0–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.0%77.1–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults85.4%83.6–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.9%58.5–67.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults47.4%44.1–50.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.4%71.0–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.2%9.3–13.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.6%16.4–21.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.6%30.6–38.7
Short sleep duration among adults48.6%43.9–53.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.6%26.8–32.6
Frequent mental distress among adults19.1%17.1–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.2%15.4–19.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.3%16.5–20.2
Any disability among adults38.2%34.4–42.0
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Independent living disability among adults12.5%11.3–13.7
Mobility disability among adults21.1%19.0–23.4
Self-care disability among adults7.4%6.8–8.0
Vision disability among adults10.1%9.3–11.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6421.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)23.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)4.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle15.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription83.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)48.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate43.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population16.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households32.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+22.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age44.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$40,515$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$238,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,204$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.8 yr ± 0.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.66 years of 73.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured